DOI: 10.14264/uql.2019.342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Free-jet testing of a Mach 12 scramjet in an expansion tube

Abstract: Scramjet technology has the theoretical potential to provide air-breathing propulsion as a more efficient alternative to conventional rocket propulsion. Since the vehicle captures its oxidiser from the atmosphere -as opposed to carrying it like a rocket -the specific impulse can theoretically be increased by an order of magnitude, thereby increasing payload mass fractions. In this context, threestage hybrid rocket-scramjet-rocket launch systems have shown to potentially provide a cost-effective and flexible so… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 180 publications
(510 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the cost for facilities that can replicate total pressure and enthalpies for scramjet flight altitudes and speeds is exceptionally high, thus the limited number of such facilities worldwide. Various methodologies have been proposed to reduce the requirements, e.g., direct connect testing, where the facility reproduces the equivalent conditions at the combustor entrance; and semi-free jet testing, where the facility produces the flow behind the forebody shock 3 . However, the above approaches cannot account for phenomena occurring upstream of the combustion, such as the ingestion of hypersonic boundary layers, transition to turbulence, forebody shock, and flow spillage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the cost for facilities that can replicate total pressure and enthalpies for scramjet flight altitudes and speeds is exceptionally high, thus the limited number of such facilities worldwide. Various methodologies have been proposed to reduce the requirements, e.g., direct connect testing, where the facility reproduces the equivalent conditions at the combustor entrance; and semi-free jet testing, where the facility produces the flow behind the forebody shock 3 . However, the above approaches cannot account for phenomena occurring upstream of the combustion, such as the ingestion of hypersonic boundary layers, transition to turbulence, forebody shock, and flow spillage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference in shock tube diameter is a product of hardware availability at the time of facility commissioning. The acceleration tube is terminated in a Mach 10 or Mach 12 diverging hypersonic nozzle [38], to increase test flow diameter, which Figure 1.2: Hardware configuration of the X3 free-piston super-orbital expansion tube [40] is housed within the 7.5 m long, 1.2 m diameter test section and dump tank. Upstream of the compression tube, the old launcher hardware and under-over reservoir arrangement from the T4 reflected shock tunnel is utilised [12], which was acquired for X3's construction to coincide with T4's upgrade to a wrap-around reservoir system in 2000 [39].…”
Section: The X3 Super-orbital Expansion Tubementioning
confidence: 99%