2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2005.07.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Free flap monitoring using simultaneous non-invasive laser Doppler flowmetry and tissue spectrophotometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

9
196
0
6

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 181 publications
(238 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
9
196
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Values of haemoglobin oxygenation below 15% and of blood flow at 2 mm tissue depth below 10 AU were highly predictive of the onset of failure in radial forearm flaps [10]. On the other hand, in another study significant differences of cutaneous haemoglobin oxygenation existed between the most donor sites [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Values of haemoglobin oxygenation below 15% and of blood flow at 2 mm tissue depth below 10 AU were highly predictive of the onset of failure in radial forearm flaps [10]. On the other hand, in another study significant differences of cutaneous haemoglobin oxygenation existed between the most donor sites [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…On day 16, a 6-hr ischemia was well tolerated by the flaps which showed definite capillary refill, even in the centre. Because the flap showed on the one hand a good capillary refill during the pedicle occlusion and on the other hand the measurements of the flap were above the critical limit [10], the decision was made to remove the pedicle of the flap after two prolonged ischemia intervals (6 hr) for another day. Consequently, the carrier flap including the radial artery as well as the cephalic vein bridge were removed on day 18.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, we have used noninvasive laser Doppler flowmetry and implantable Doppler in selected high risk flaps, such as those with difficult anastomoses, buried flaps, and take-back flaps, where the skin is no longer a reliable monitor. Although many methods of free flap monitoring are available, 12,13 there is still no consensus on the most reliable noninvasive technique for early recognition of flap failure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,9 Newer methods that have been developed for monitoring are tissue spectophotometry, laser Doppler flowmetry, and tissue oxygen pressure measuring probes. [10][11][12] Although the conventional techniques mentioned above are reliable in most flaps, they are not in buried flaps because of their external component. 3,13 To better monitor buried flaps implantable Doppler probes are available.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%