2021
DOI: 10.1007/jhep05(2021)202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Free energy and defect C-theorem in free fermion

Abstract: We describe a p-dimensional conformal defect of a free Dirac fermion on a d-dimensional flat space as boundary conditions on a conformally equivalent space ℍp+1×$$ \mathbbm{S} $$ S d−p−1. We classify allowed boundary conditions and find that the Dirichlet type of boundary conditions always exists while the Neumann type of boundary condition exists only for a two-codimensional defect. For the two-codimensional defect, a double trace deformation triggers a renormalization group … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, unlike standard d = 2 CFTs where there is a single central charge c, p = 2 dCFTs have three trace anomaly coefficients labelled b, d 1 , and d 2 , which play the role of putative central charges. 1 The absence of a conserved stress tensor makes proving statements about positivity [12] and c-theorems [13][14][15][16][17][18] for defect central charges more difficult, though not impossible. This is particularly salient for p = 2 where one does not generally expect an enhancement from a global SO(2, 2) conformal symmetry to a full Virasoro symmetry unless the defect completely decouples or the ambient theory is topological.…”
Section: Jhep08(2021)013mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, unlike standard d = 2 CFTs where there is a single central charge c, p = 2 dCFTs have three trace anomaly coefficients labelled b, d 1 , and d 2 , which play the role of putative central charges. 1 The absence of a conserved stress tensor makes proving statements about positivity [12] and c-theorems [13][14][15][16][17][18] for defect central charges more difficult, though not impossible. This is particularly salient for p = 2 where one does not generally expect an enhancement from a global SO(2, 2) conformal symmetry to a full Virasoro symmetry unless the defect completely decouples or the ambient theory is topological.…”
Section: Jhep08(2021)013mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( 6. 15) is defined at an arbitrary UV cut-off scale Λ, which we can interpret as the defect thickness. The IR physics should be independent of this scale and eventually we will send Λ → ∞.…”
Section: Defect Beta Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, unlike standard d = 2 CFTs where there is a single central charge c, p = 2 dCFTs have three trace anomaly coefficients labelled b, d 1 , and d 2 , which play the role of putative central charges. 1 The absence of a conserved stress tensor makes proving statements about positivity [12] and c-theorems [13][14][15][16][17] for defect central charges more difficult, though not impossible. This is particularly salient for p = 2 where one does not generally expect an enhancement from a global SO(2, 2) conformal symmetry to a full Virasoro symmetry unless the defect completely decouples or the ambient theory is topological.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore we obtain the partition function of the massless Dirac fermion on S a × AdS b which has the same expression as we obtained it for S a+b in (4.7). In the recent work of [31] the equality of the partition function of Dirac fermion has been checked numerically.…”
Section: Jhep10(2021)236mentioning
confidence: 99%