2008 5th International Symposium on Turbo Codes and Related Topics 2008
DOI: 10.1109/turbocoding.2008.4658734
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Free distance bounds for protograph-based regular LDPC convolutional codes

Abstract: In this paper asymptotic methods are used to form lower bounds on the free distance to constraint length ratio of several ensembles of regular, asymptotically good, protographbased LDPC convolutional codes. In particular, we show that the free distance to constraint length ratio of the regular LDPC convolutional codes exceeds that of the minimum distance to block length ratio of the corresponding LDPC block codes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7. Just as we expect the tail-biting ensemble zero-contour curve values δ (λ) ts (0) to correspond to minimum distance growth rates of the associated block code ensembles, we expect that the lower bound on the free distance growth rate δ f ree of the regular convolutional codes (found in [9]) based on the displayed cuts correspond to the value δ ccts (0) of the convolutional lower bound zero-contour curve. This can be seen in Figure 8, where the lower bounds on δ ccts (∆) = α are plotted against ∆α = β to form a convolutional lower bound zero-contour curve for each of the regular convolutional ensembles considered.…”
Section: B Regular Ensembles With Gcd(n C N V ) =mentioning
confidence: 93%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…7. Just as we expect the tail-biting ensemble zero-contour curve values δ (λ) ts (0) to correspond to minimum distance growth rates of the associated block code ensembles, we expect that the lower bound on the free distance growth rate δ f ree of the regular convolutional codes (found in [9]) based on the displayed cuts correspond to the value δ ccts (0) of the convolutional lower bound zero-contour curve. This can be seen in Figure 8, where the lower bounds on δ ccts (∆) = α are plotted against ∆α = β to form a convolutional lower bound zero-contour curve for each of the regular convolutional ensembles considered.…”
Section: B Regular Ensembles With Gcd(n C N V ) =mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…As described in Section V, we make use of ensembles of tail-biting LDPC convolutional codes to obtain a lower bound on the desired ∆-trapping set growth rate of the associated unterminated convolutional code family. 5 If the syndrome former matrix is not in minimal form, (9) results in an upper bound on νe, which implies that δccts(∆) is underestimated in this case.…”
Section: A Lower Bound On the Convolutional ∆-Trapping Set Growth mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations