1978
DOI: 10.1109/t-ed.1978.19066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Free carrier absorption in silicon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
56
1
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
56
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These structures represent solar cells in which the emitter and back-surface field (possible sources of free-carrier absorption) have been omitted, so that parasitic absorption at 1200 nm occurs only in the silver reflector (note that, with a doping density of 1.5310 15 cm 23 , the wafer itself has a free-carrier absorption coefficient of 2310 23 cm 21 at 1200 nm and absorbs only 0.01% of light per pass 24 ). The measured spectra are shown with symbols in Figure 6.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These structures represent solar cells in which the emitter and back-surface field (possible sources of free-carrier absorption) have been omitted, so that parasitic absorption at 1200 nm occurs only in the silver reflector (note that, with a doping density of 1.5310 15 cm 23 , the wafer itself has a free-carrier absorption coefficient of 2310 23 cm 21 at 1200 nm and absorbs only 0.01% of light per pass 24 ). The measured spectra are shown with symbols in Figure 6.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…tion and effect of the doping on absorption profile. The optical transmissivity of doped silicon is a function of the sheet resistance and incident wavelengths [48]. Hence, the peak responsivity of the OPFET device can be controlled by adjustment of doping in the absorption layer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used 1 Ω cm for the resistivity of the III-V and Si region, corresponding to doping concentration of around 10 16 cm −3 , and 1 × 10 −4 Ω cm 2 for the metal/semiconductor interfacial contact resistance, although their variation hardly affect the current density profile result as we tested. Note that for this doping concentration additive α i induced by free carrier absorption is on the order of 0.1 cm −1 at 1.55 μm [8,9], much smaller than α metal i calculated in Section 2.2, and therefore negligible. Fig.…”
Section: Lateral Current Confinementmentioning
confidence: 55%