2020
DOI: 10.5114/wo.2020.94724
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Free cancer cells in gastric cancer – methods of detection, clinical and prognostic importance (meta-analysis)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 16 suggested that EIPL had no survival benefit for patients with GC undergoing curative gastrectomy. IPC has been reported to eliminate potential free cancer cells from the peritoneal cavity 20 . Several studies had found that IPC could reduce peritoneal metastases and improve the survival outcome of patients with GC 7 14 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 16 suggested that EIPL had no survival benefit for patients with GC undergoing curative gastrectomy. IPC has been reported to eliminate potential free cancer cells from the peritoneal cavity 20 . Several studies had found that IPC could reduce peritoneal metastases and improve the survival outcome of patients with GC 7 14 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although peritoneal metastasis can be diagnosed, prediction of future postoperative relapse is different and more challenging in clinic. Cytologic examination of peritoneal lavage was used to determine peritoneal metastasis, but it was reported to be invasive, time consuming, and expensive 18 20 . Other conventional imaging modalities, including computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT), or ultrasonography, yielded unsatisfactory accuracy for PR prediction 21 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PM is a frequent metastasis pattern in GC and remains a challenging clinical issue. In the era of precision therapy, ongoing research focuses on molecular characterization and biomarkers to predict PM ( Chen et al, 2020 ; Kolomanska & Gluszek, 2020 ). Diverse prediction models, including PET-CT radiomics features ( Xie et al, 2023 ) and those for late-stage GC occult PM ( Gao et al, 2023 ), are being explored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many basic methods of peritoneal lavage analysis have been described in the literature: The classical cytology involving examination of a smear made from a cell pellet on the microscope slide and a pigment assessment conducted by an experienced pathologist ( 6 ), the immunohistochemical method using the reaction of antibodies against antigens present on cancer cells ( 7 ), the immunoenzymatic method assessing the CEA level in the supernatant after centrifugation of lavage fluid ( 8 ), and molecular methods involving the identification of cancer cell genes employing RT-PCR techniques ( 9 ). These methods differ in sensitivity and specificity in predicting peritoneal recurrence, and cytology remains the gold standard for peritoneal lavage examination ( 10 ) due to its simplicity in implementation, the short analysis time, low costs, and its high specificity in predicting peritoneal recurrence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%