2020
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6587/ab9a61
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Free-boundary MRxMHD equilibrium calculations using the stepped-pressure equilibrium code

Abstract: The stepped-pressure equilibrium code (SPEC) [Hudson et al., Phys. Plasmas 19, 112502 (2012)] is extended to enable free-boundary, multi-region relaxed magnetohydrodynamic (MRxMHD) equilibrium calculations. The vacuum field surrounding the plasma inside an arbitrary 'computational boundary', D, is computed, and the virtual-casing principle is used iteratively to compute the normal field on D so that the equilibrium is consistent with an externally produced magnetic field. Recent modifications to SPEC are descr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
55
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
(140 reference statements)
0
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where the magnetic field, B = ∇×A and the C < p,l and C > t,l are circuits about the inner (<) and outer(>) boundaries of Ω l in the poloidal and toroidal directions, respectively. The enclosed poloidal flux ∆ψ p , toroidal flux ∆ψ t and the ideal interface boundary condition √ gB•∇s = 0 are enforced by a set of Lagrange multipliers (e i for the i th Fourier harmonic of interface boundary condition, and c 1 , d 1 for the fluxes) [10]. Additionally, in annular volumes, the gauge dependency of the vector potential defined as A ϑ (−1, ϑ, ζ) = 0 and A ζ (−1, ϑ, ζ) = 0, are enforced by the Lagrange multipliers a i and b i respectively for the i th Fourier harmonics.…”
Section: Numerical Procedures To Construct Mrxmhd Equilibrium With Specmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…where the magnetic field, B = ∇×A and the C < p,l and C > t,l are circuits about the inner (<) and outer(>) boundaries of Ω l in the poloidal and toroidal directions, respectively. The enclosed poloidal flux ∆ψ p , toroidal flux ∆ψ t and the ideal interface boundary condition √ gB•∇s = 0 are enforced by a set of Lagrange multipliers (e i for the i th Fourier harmonic of interface boundary condition, and c 1 , d 1 for the fluxes) [10]. Additionally, in annular volumes, the gauge dependency of the vector potential defined as A ϑ (−1, ϑ, ζ) = 0 and A ζ (−1, ϑ, ζ) = 0, are enforced by the Lagrange multipliers a i and b i respectively for the i th Fourier harmonics.…”
Section: Numerical Procedures To Construct Mrxmhd Equilibrium With Specmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The matrices A l , B l and D l are constructed within each Ω l by inserting the representation for the vector potential given in Eqns. (9) and (10) into Eqn. (11) and computing the volume-dependent integrals.…”
Section: Numerical Procedures To Construct Mrxmhd Equilibrium With Specmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In reality, however, the geometry of the plasma boundary is not known a priori. Free-boundary equilibrium calculations require as input the external magnetic field, and the self-consistent plasma boundary is determined as part of the equilibrium calculation (Hirshman, van Rij & Merkel 1986;Hudson et al 2020). Existing free-boundary equilibrium codes invariably perform additional iterations compared with their fixed-boundary analogues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%