2005
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-30587-3_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Free and Proprietary Software in COTS-Based Software Development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although much research has focused on the reuse of Off-The-Shelf (OTS) components, both Commercial OTS (COTS) and OSS, in corporate software production [25,36], the reusability "of" OSS projects "in" other OSS projects has only started to draw the attention of researchers and developers in OSS communities [22,28,7]. A vast amount of code is created daily, modified and stored in OSS repositories, yet, software reuse is rarely perceived by OSS developers as a critical success factor in their projects or processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although much research has focused on the reuse of Off-The-Shelf (OTS) components, both Commercial OTS (COTS) and OSS, in corporate software production [25,36], the reusability "of" OSS projects "in" other OSS projects has only started to draw the attention of researchers and developers in OSS communities [22,28,7]. A vast amount of code is created daily, modified and stored in OSS repositories, yet, software reuse is rarely perceived by OSS developers as a critical success factor in their projects or processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reasons discovered by past works [34] are enough for developers to start their own project and duplicate efforts. This could mean also that the reuse of code written by others has to overcome similar obstacles, apart from the technical ones, as already evaluated by [20]. In terms of activity and code released, it was observed that the Arla project spans some 8 years of development, Gaim approximately 6.5 years, MPlayer 4.5, while XMMS 5 years.…”
Section: Case Studies -Evolutionary Analysismentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Other characteristics determine whether a module should be reused in another system. Apart from those already cited by [20], there could be inherent reasons for not reusing a specific module, even if its instability is low at the coupling level. It could be that it is too small, or that it is very complex (in terms of cyclomatic complexity, for instance).…”
Section: Conclusion Further Work and Threats To Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations