2019
DOI: 10.1080/1369183x.2019.1592876
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Free and clear: national origins and progress toward unencumbered homeownership among post-civil rights era immigrants in the US

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Emeka (2020) compared levels of unencumbered homeownership among immigrants by national origins vis‐à‐vis native‐born cohorts, seeing homeownership as part of an immigrant integration process that intersects with differential access to housing markets in relation to resources available through co‐ethnic communities. Although his classification scheme relied on the Census definitions, by examining the intersection of citizenship status and national origins, Emeka (2020) teased out structural features, such as refugee and reunification provisions that facilitated or slowed socioeconomic integration of some groups. In addition, comparisons between “US‐born Black” populations, “Sub‐Saharan Africans,” and “Afro‐Caribbean” immigrants helped to complicate the singular treatment of Black and African American residents in the United States.…”
Section: Findings Of the Problematizing Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emeka (2020) compared levels of unencumbered homeownership among immigrants by national origins vis‐à‐vis native‐born cohorts, seeing homeownership as part of an immigrant integration process that intersects with differential access to housing markets in relation to resources available through co‐ethnic communities. Although his classification scheme relied on the Census definitions, by examining the intersection of citizenship status and national origins, Emeka (2020) teased out structural features, such as refugee and reunification provisions that facilitated or slowed socioeconomic integration of some groups. In addition, comparisons between “US‐born Black” populations, “Sub‐Saharan Africans,” and “Afro‐Caribbean” immigrants helped to complicate the singular treatment of Black and African American residents in the United States.…”
Section: Findings Of the Problematizing Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study suggests that homeownership is an important factor associated with declines in murder and motor-vehicle theft. Future research should examine the link between immigration, homeownership, and crime, particularly for groups that have higher rates of homeownership than nativeborn Whites, like Chinese and Asian Indians (Emeka 2020) and for those groups that are explicitly attracted to distressed areas of cities (Adelman 2020;Adelman et al 2019;Pottie-Sherman 2018). Finally, future ecological research may benefit from employing solutions to address the issues of causality and selection bias (D. S. Kirk and Laub 2010).…”
Section: Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Black and Latino homeowners have less home equity than similarly situated White owners (Krivo and Kaufman 2004). Nationality, nativity, immigrant status, and skin tone also influence household wealth and reinforce the salience of race (Allen 2011;Emeka 2019;McConnell and Akresh 2013;Painter and Qian 2015;Salgado and Ortiz 2019;Tesfai 2017). Legal permanent residents are among the most advantaged recent immigrants in terms of home equity (McConnell and Akresh 2013).…”
Section: Contemporary Latino Residential Stratification and Racial Inmentioning
confidence: 99%