2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00222-009-0217-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fredholm properties of Riemannian exponential maps on diffeomorphism groups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
123
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
123
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is then easy to check that in all possible cases, the term (17) can be bounded in terms of the F m norm of ξ . We can similarly prove for m ≥ 1 that η ∈ K m+1 and inf|η | > 0 implies ξ ∈ F m , by using formula (16). We note as a consequence that when ξ is purely imaginary (corresponding to η ∈ A m ), we get a bijective correspondence between an open subset of A m+1 and an open subset of {0} × F m [R] for any m ≥ 1.…”
Section: The Manifold Structure Of the Arc Space A Kmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is then easy to check that in all possible cases, the term (17) can be bounded in terms of the F m norm of ξ . We can similarly prove for m ≥ 1 that η ∈ K m+1 and inf|η | > 0 implies ξ ∈ F m , by using formula (16). We note as a consequence that when ξ is purely imaginary (corresponding to η ∈ A m ), we get a bijective correspondence between an open subset of A m+1 and an open subset of {0} × F m [R] for any m ≥ 1.…”
Section: The Manifold Structure Of the Arc Space A Kmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The reason for this is that the connection of a submanifold is obtained from the connection on the full manifold by orthogonal projection, and the orthogonal projection operator is not smooth (using the metric (20)). In other situations, when we get a smooth ODE on a submanifold, it is due to smoothness of the orthogonal projection: see, for example, [7] and [16].…”
Section: The Geodesic Equationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Since K u 0 is compact by Proposition 3.2, we know (d exp e ) tu 0 will be a Fredholm operator, and hence the exponential map will be a non-linear Fredholm map. As a consequence [10] we obtain that conjugate points are of finite multiplicity and form a discrete set along any geodesic, along with various other analogues of theorems in global Riemannian geometry which would otherwise fail in infinite dimensions.…”
Section: The Exponential Mapmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…(See[6,10].) Suppose we have a Lie group G with a right-invariant metric and a smooth geodesic η(t) with η(0) = e and η(0) = u 0 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As is usual when studying diffeomorphism groups (Ebin and Marsden 1970;Misiołek and Preston 2010), the Fréchet manifold structure leads to analytical difficulties when studying geometry due to the lack of an Inverse Function Theorem and to the possibility of non-integrability of vector fields. Hence we enlarge the group to the set of diffeomorphisms η ∈ D s (M) of Sobolev class H s for s > dim M/2 + 1 = n + 3/2, consisting of those maps whose derivatives up to order s are square-integrable in every coordinate chart of compact support.…”
Section: The Riemannian Structure Of the Contactomorphism Groupmentioning
confidence: 99%