2014
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)cc.1943-5614.0000464
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FRCM Strengthening of Shear-Critical RC Beams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
21
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A more detailed description of this phenomenon is presented in Section 2.3. configurations or continuous U-jackets with (26%) or without anchors (17%) configurations. Comparing the 6 additional shear strength VFRCM relative to VCON for these two configurations, although slightly higher values of VFRCM/VCON are related to the U-continuous configuration, it is not possible to conclude that using this configuration will guarantee a better performance of the strengthened beam, which agrees with [15] who concluded that side bonded and U-wrapped configurations showed similar performance in terms of strength. In side bonded configurations detachment of the FRCM composite was less frequently observed, while for Uwrapped configuration most failures were accompanied by composite detachment, either at the compositesubstrate interface or within the substrate.…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Database And Distribution Of Datasupporting
confidence: 52%
“…A more detailed description of this phenomenon is presented in Section 2.3. configurations or continuous U-jackets with (26%) or without anchors (17%) configurations. Comparing the 6 additional shear strength VFRCM relative to VCON for these two configurations, although slightly higher values of VFRCM/VCON are related to the U-continuous configuration, it is not possible to conclude that using this configuration will guarantee a better performance of the strengthened beam, which agrees with [15] who concluded that side bonded and U-wrapped configurations showed similar performance in terms of strength. In side bonded configurations detachment of the FRCM composite was less frequently observed, while for Uwrapped configuration most failures were accompanied by composite detachment, either at the compositesubstrate interface or within the substrate.…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Database And Distribution Of Datasupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Results. The performance of the proposed model was evaluated through a comparison between the numerically predicted values and existing experimental results [4,10,11,14]. The geometry and material properties of RC beam specimens of the existing tests are presented in Table 7.…”
Section: Comparison Between the Proposed Model And Existing Experimentalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On this basis, FRP has been applied for strengthening RC structures in various forms such as sheets, plates, and strips since the early 1990s [3]. Many studies on FRP have validated the effectiveness of its use as a strengthening material [4]. However, FRP is accompanied by several distinct disadvantages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the specimens strengthened with FRCM were destroyed due to the loss of reinforcing effect caused by peeling of the FCRM composite [11]. Azam and Soudki [15] conducted an experimental study to investigate the strengthening performance of beams strengthened in shear with the FRCM method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental results showed that the ultimate load increase of 19% to 105% from the type of fibers and strengthening type has no significant effect on failure mode and failure load of the specimen [15]. Jung et al [16] conducted flexural tests on FRCM-reinforced beams by varying the type of fabric and the number of fabric layers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%