2020
DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab87a4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FRB Periodicity: Mild Pulsars in Tight O/B-star Binaries

Abstract: Periodicities observed in two Fast Radio Burst (FRB) sources (16 days in FRB 180916.J0158+65 and 160 days in FRB 121102) are consistent with that of tight, stellar mass binary systems. In the case of FRB 180916.J0158+65 the primary is an early OB-type star with mass loss rateṀ ∼ 10 −8 − 10 −7 M yr −1 , and the secondary a neutron star. The observed periodicity is not intrinsic to the FRB's source, but is due to the orbital phase-dependent modulation of the absorption conditions in the massive star's wind. The … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
91
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
91
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The recurrent FRB 180916 was recently shown by the CHIME/ FRB collaboration to exhibit a 16 day period of unknown origin (CHIME/FRB Collaboration et al 2020a). Again, although known Galactic magnetars offer no clear explanation for periodic behavior at this scale (with the possible exception of candidate magnetar 1E 1613485055, which has a measured period of 6.7 hr; de Luca et al 2006), reasonable variations in the properties of extragalactic magnetars (e.g., extremely slow rotation, precession, or presence in a binary) offer a potential explanation (Beniamini et al 2020;Levin et al 2020;Lyutikov et al 2020;Tong et al 2020;Yang & Zou 2020;Zanazzi & Lai 2020). Furthermore, a few FRBs have been localized to host galaxies with low levels of star formation (Bannister et al 2019;Ravi 2019) uncharacteristic of the environments of magnetars in the Milky Way as being the product of relatively typical CCSNe, although more recent localizations show that the population as a whole remains broadly consistent with CCSN host galaxies (Bhandari et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The recurrent FRB 180916 was recently shown by the CHIME/ FRB collaboration to exhibit a 16 day period of unknown origin (CHIME/FRB Collaboration et al 2020a). Again, although known Galactic magnetars offer no clear explanation for periodic behavior at this scale (with the possible exception of candidate magnetar 1E 1613485055, which has a measured period of 6.7 hr; de Luca et al 2006), reasonable variations in the properties of extragalactic magnetars (e.g., extremely slow rotation, precession, or presence in a binary) offer a potential explanation (Beniamini et al 2020;Levin et al 2020;Lyutikov et al 2020;Tong et al 2020;Yang & Zou 2020;Zanazzi & Lai 2020). Furthermore, a few FRBs have been localized to host galaxies with low levels of star formation (Bannister et al 2019;Ravi 2019) uncharacteristic of the environments of magnetars in the Milky Way as being the product of relatively typical CCSNe, although more recent localizations show that the population as a whole remains broadly consistent with CCSN host galaxies (Bhandari et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Bursts detected at 400-800 MHz occur within a 5 day window that repeats every 16.3 days (CHIME/FRB Collaboration et al 2020a). Multiple models have been proposed to explain the periodicity: the orbital motion of the FRB source (neutron star or magnetar) around a companion (Dai et al 2016;Ioka & Zhang 2020;Lyutikov et al 2020), precession of the burst emitting object itself (e.g., Levin et al 2020;Yang & Zou 2020;Zanazzi & Lai 2020), or ultralong rotational periods of the bursting object (Beniamini et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33 ). Such a longterm periodicity can be accommodated within the framework of binary [34][35][36] or precession [37][38][39] models.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%