2020 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/ipdps47924.2020.00065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FRaZ: A Generic High-Fidelity Fixed-Ratio Lossy Compression Framework for Scientific Floating-point Data

Abstract: With ever-increasing volumes of scientific floatingpoint data being produced by high-performance computing applications, significantly reducing scientific floating-point data size is critical, and error-controlled lossy compressors have been developed for years. None of the existing scientific floating-point lossy data compressors, however, support effective fixed-ratio lossy compression. Yet fixed-ratio lossy compression for scientific floating-point data not only compresses to the requested ratio but also re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although ZFP [8] provides a fix-rate mode (i.e., fix-compression-ratio), its compression quality is significantly worse than that of the error-bounding mode, as verified by Underwood et al [33]. This requires ZFP users to conduct a trial-and-error approach to obtain a target compression ratio given a scientific dataset [12], [33]. The lack of compression ratio estimation and data quality estimation make lossy compression users rely on the trial-anderror technique for compression parameter optimization [12], [13].…”
Section: B Error-bounded Lossy Compressionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although ZFP [8] provides a fix-rate mode (i.e., fix-compression-ratio), its compression quality is significantly worse than that of the error-bounding mode, as verified by Underwood et al [33]. This requires ZFP users to conduct a trial-and-error approach to obtain a target compression ratio given a scientific dataset [12], [33]. The lack of compression ratio estimation and data quality estimation make lossy compression users rely on the trial-anderror technique for compression parameter optimization [12], [13].…”
Section: B Error-bounded Lossy Compressionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…SZ -a popular prediction-based lossy compressor, for example, cannot perform compression based on a given target compression ratio. Although ZFP [8] provides a fix-rate mode (i.e., fix-compression-ratio), its compression quality is significantly worse than that of the error-bounding mode, as verified by Underwood et al [33]. This requires ZFP users to conduct a trial-and-error approach to obtain a target compression ratio given a scientific dataset [12], [33].…”
Section: B Error-bounded Lossy Compressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, if we repeat our experiment for a larger number of iterations, we achieve a value within 5-10% of peak performance. The high-cost of autotuning for larger percentages and larger number of iterations could be amortized over several compressor configurations as recent work has shows that for time-series data -e.g., fields in a scientific application -a optimal compressor configuration remains mostly constant through time [32]. We find, for example, that across all 48 time-steps of a field of the Hurricane Isabel dataset, an average of 80% of the autotuning runs result in two top configurations.…”
Section: F Autotuning Block Size and Vector Lengthmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…] @2.1.11.1 lossy compressor ZFP [4] @0.5.5 lossy compressor MGARD [6] @0.1.0 lossy compressor gstat [22] @2.0-7 obtain variogram range numpy [23] @1.21.1 polyfit function to graph the curves Libpressio [24] @0.70.0 compress and measure the data TABLE I COMPRESSORS AND SOFTWARE USED FOR THE STUDY latest available on Spack from a selection of leading errorbounded lossy compressors. We use the absolute error bound because it is supported by each of the leading error-bounded lossy compressors.…”
Section: Each Lossy Compressor In Tablementioning
confidence: 99%