1976
DOI: 10.5962/p.314507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Francis Day (1829-1889) and his collection of Indian fishes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nominal species described by Leiocassis fluviatilis Day (1888: 805) has been treated as a synonym of B. tengana by Hora & Law (1941). Its syntypes are apparently lost (Whitehead & Talwar, 1976;Eschmeyer, 1998). The original description of L. fluviatilis is brief and not very informative.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nominal species described by Leiocassis fluviatilis Day (1888: 805) has been treated as a synonym of B. tengana by Hora & Law (1941). Its syntypes are apparently lost (Whitehead & Talwar, 1976;Eschmeyer, 1998). The original description of L. fluviatilis is brief and not very informative.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later, Day (1875) described Sebastes stoliczkae as a new species based on the holotype from the Nicobar Islands in the Andaman Sea. Although the holotype of S. stoliczkae was lost during WWII (see Chopra, 1947;Whitehead and Talwar, 1976), the nominal species has been regarded as a junior synonym of S. vaigiensis, based on the original description and drawing. Therefore, the only currently recognized member of Centrogenys (also the family Centrogenyidae) is C. vaigiensis, which has been recorded as widespread in the Indo-West Pacific region, ranging from Mauritius east to New Guinea and Australia and north to southern Japan (Gill, 1999;Matsunuma et al, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blyth was the curator of the museum of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, and types of the fishes he described were initially deposited at the Society's museum; this material was subsequently transferred to the Indian Museum (now the Zoological Survey of India (Whitehead & Talwar, 1976). Hora (1950) Day (p. 453) commented that "Berdmore sent 5 or 6 specimens to the Calcutta Museum".…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This type material is also not mentioned in the catalogue of fish types in that collection (Menon & Yazdani, 1968). The fish collections of the ZSI suffered extensive loss and damage as a result of a flood when the collection was temporarily housed in Benares during the Second World War (Chopra, 1947;Whitehead & Talwar, 1976), and the type(s) of H. filamentosa might have been lost at that time or is(are) mislabelled or misplaced. It is not known if Hora examined ZSI 585 before or after the war.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%