Framing The Greek Memoranda (2010-2015): A Polarised yet Hollow Debate

Abstract

This study examines the contribution of media frames to democratic debate. Focusing on Greece, the article investigates how the press frames the Greek memoranda (2010-2015) and the contribution of these frames to the construction of democratic debate. Relying on an in-depth qualitative framing analysis of the coverage of the three memoranda and combining insights from framing theory and political economy, the major frames that shaped debates on the issue and the boundaries of discourse that they set are identified. The findings illustrate that, while the application of frames might differ across outlets, a rather uniform debate around the memoranda is promoted through the press. These results raise doubts about the performance of the media in the coverage of the most significant political issue in Greece’s recent history, and reveal the silencing of alternative voices that could have challenged the dominant frames of the debate.

Framing migration in the Greek press; An analysis of the ‘Evros events’ in left, liberal, and far-right newspapers

“…Ta Nea is the highest selling newspaper in Greece. However, it faced significant hardship during the economic crisis and was acquired by Alter Ego Media owned by Evaggelos Marinakis in 2017 (Kostopoulos, 2020b). Ever since it has adopted a centrist and center-right wing editorial stance.…”

Sticking to the status quo with a twist: Western media representations of fiscal negotiations during the Greek economic crisis

“…In Greece, mainstream media also deployed frames that promoted neoliberal policies as the solution to the country's defects (Doudaki et al 2016: 440). Frames across Greek newspapers differed, but the debate around the memoranda—the financial agreements between Greece and its creditors—was uniform (Kostopoulos, 2020).…”