2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2015.08.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Framing sound: Using expectations to reduce environmental noise annoyance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
13
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This conclusion is supported by the findings in Crichton's study (Crichton et al, 2015) that shows that having knowledge of the sounds being bad for your well-being will increase noise annoyance. This assumption is also supported by the data in this study, which shows that preschools teachers with a hearing reduction also experience more noise annoyance, although the Chi-Square analyses was not statically significant.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This conclusion is supported by the findings in Crichton's study (Crichton et al, 2015) that shows that having knowledge of the sounds being bad for your well-being will increase noise annoyance. This assumption is also supported by the data in this study, which shows that preschools teachers with a hearing reduction also experience more noise annoyance, although the Chi-Square analyses was not statically significant.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The attitude towards the noise source may also be driven by the exposed individual's prior knowledge of the noise. If a person, exposed to noise, also know that the noise exposure may cause harm or long term ill-health this person is also more likely to report noise annoyance (Crichton, Dodd, Schmid, & Petrie, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, in field surveys individual attributes of the participants such as noise sensitivity or attitude were found to significantly affect annoyance (see Sec. I), which was neither observed here nor in a laboratory study by Legarth (2007), and only partly in a laboratory study by Crichton et al (2015).Th isismo stp ro b ab lydu eto the fact that in laboratory experiments, participants' ratings are closely related to the sensory perception of the sounds present at the time of rating. Consistent with this, laboratory annoyance ratings are usually highly correlated with perceived loudness (Guski and Bosshardt, 1992), which in turn strongly depends on the (physical) sound pressure level.…”
Section: B Comparability Of the Results With Field Surveyscontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…Parks in city centers meet this requirement. However, quiet zones in these areas are difficult to separate [10,11]. The statement about acoustic nuisance occurring in the park does not have to coincide with the noise distribution determined on the basis of the measurements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%