2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.wsif.2012.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Framing sexual harassment through media representations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
44
1
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
44
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, variations in individual SH complaints within the different groups examined illustrate the difficulty in attributing specific yet consistent explanations for different manifestations based on sex dyad. The study does, however, redress the lack of empirical attention to and community recognition of atypical SH, including by the media which tend to emphasize salacious sexual conduct by high profile men against female subordinates (McDonald and Charlesworth, 2013). In this way, the studycontributes to a more nuanced characterization of SH that may be useful for guiding individual responses and organizational practices that more effectively prevent and redress SH in its various guises (Dubois et al, 1998) and for informing future research and changing public discourse.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Indeed, variations in individual SH complaints within the different groups examined illustrate the difficulty in attributing specific yet consistent explanations for different manifestations based on sex dyad. The study does, however, redress the lack of empirical attention to and community recognition of atypical SH, including by the media which tend to emphasize salacious sexual conduct by high profile men against female subordinates (McDonald and Charlesworth, 2013). In this way, the studycontributes to a more nuanced characterization of SH that may be useful for guiding individual responses and organizational practices that more effectively prevent and redress SH in its various guises (Dubois et al, 1998) and for informing future research and changing public discourse.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This article builds on that approach by considering not only the contextual structures of the experience but also the agency of employees who have experienced customer‐perpetrated sexual harassment, allowing for an understanding of the nuances of employee response, as well as the contextual and normative factors that influence, shape and frame this. In doing so, the article attempts to address the call for more qualitative research into employees’ experiences of sexual harassment and customer‐perpetrated harassment in particular (Handy, ; McDonald, , p. 11), and responds to the exhortation of key researchers for the need for more research on extra‐legal responses to sexual harassment ‘below the tip of the iceberg’ of litigation through the court system (McDonald et al , ). The article attempts to understand the gendered nature of service work and how this impacts employee responses to a gendered employment issue, sexual harassment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Almost one in five respondents indicated that they had not been sexually harassed when read the legal definition of sexual harassment, but reported experiencing behaviours likely to constitute unlawful sexual harassment (AHRC, 2012a: 18). Despite dominant media framings of sexual harassment as involving harassment of a particular individual by an employer or manager/supervisor (McDonald and Charlesworth, 2013), the AHRC survey indicated that more than half of the harassers identified by survey respondents were co-workers (AHRC, 2012a: 35).…”
Section: Sexual Harassmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately such an extensive and resource-intensive review of other large employers is unlikely. However, the ADF Review underscores the importance of framing sexual harassment not just as an issue of an aberrant individual behaving badly, but as systemic sex discrimination (McDonald and Charlesworth, 2013).…”
Section: Sexual Harassmentmentioning
confidence: 99%