2014
DOI: 10.1177/1354067x13515936
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Framing “I can’t draw”: The influence of cultural frames on the development of drawing

Abstract: Why is it that many people feel that they ''can't draw''? In a recent article (Cohn, 2012), I put forth a new theory that compared the cognitive structure of drawing to the cognitive structure of language. Like language, drawing uses schemas that combine in innumerable novel ways, and thus children learning to draw must acquire these schemas from the drawings in their environment. However, while most people in the United States and Europe ''can't draw,'' Japanese children have far greater proficiency in drawin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If drawings represent what people see, they should be universal, since all people ostensibly have the same perceptual capacities. Differences in producing drawings thus reduce to "talent," despite the assumed universality in their understanding (for review, see Cohn, 2014a;Willats, 2005;Wilson, 1988).…”
Section: Reasoning For Universalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If drawings represent what people see, they should be universal, since all people ostensibly have the same perceptual capacities. Differences in producing drawings thus reduce to "talent," despite the assumed universality in their understanding (for review, see Cohn, 2014a;Willats, 2005;Wilson, 1988).…”
Section: Reasoning For Universalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, such studies never include measures of visual narrative reading experience, despite longstanding findings that the PAT is modulated by cultural background (Breiger, 1956), and age and experience with visual narratives (A. L. Brown, 1975;Fivush & Mandler, 1985;Friedman, 1990;Nakazawa, 2016;Weist et al, 1999;Weist et al, 1997). The PAT is also confounded because it is scored relative to a "correct" order, despite multiple well-formed sequences being possible when accounting for the structure of visual narratives (Cohn, 2014b).…”
Section: Caveats For Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We do not see such copying or direct referencing of the cultural texts (short films and picture books) or other students' work as problematic. Rather, it is a sign of dialogic interactions and proof of learning (Cohn 2014;Mavers 2011).…”
Section: A Sociocultural Approach To Student-made Artifactsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having mastered any way of the image, the child repeats it in each subsequent drawing, without trying to apply other ways. This phenomenon has been studied by foreign researchers (Cohn, 2012(Cohn, , 2014Cox, Koyasu, Hiranuma, & Perara 2001;Gašić-Pavišić & Lazarević, 2002;Leung, 2017;Rose & Jolley, 2016) and domestic scientists, having received different names: "pictographic symbol", stereotyping, templates, stamps, "graphic formula". The attitude to the stereotyping of children's drawings also differs among different researchers.…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%