2018
DOI: 10.3390/w10091278
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Framework for WASH Sector Data Improvements in Data-Poor Environments, Applied to Accra, Ghana

Abstract: Improvements in water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) service provision are hampered by limited open data availability. This paper presents a data integration framework, collects the data and develops a material flow model, which aids data-based policy and infrastructure development for the WASH sector. This model provides a robust quantitative mapping of the complete anthropogenic WASH flow-cycle: from raw water intake to water use, wastewater and excreta generation, discharge and treatment. This approach inte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Key assumptions made were 1) that water inflow is similar for septic tanks and latrines, 2) that type of container does not influence faecal sludge characteristics (based on Eliyan et al ( 2022)); and 3) that water and excreta are the only substances entering the container, since water is used for anal cleansing and households predominantly have a piped water connection, while the small proportion of the population that use toilet tissue for wiping usually dispose of it in trash bins with other types of solid waste. According to Koppelaar et al (2018), an average of 58.6 L/cap/day of water enter the sewage container (C w ) in developing countries. The input values used for calculating Q 3 , i.e., emptied volume, number of users and emptying frequency, were the average value for each category based on the household questionnaire and triangulated with data from the container emptying contractors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Key assumptions made were 1) that water inflow is similar for septic tanks and latrines, 2) that type of container does not influence faecal sludge characteristics (based on Eliyan et al ( 2022)); and 3) that water and excreta are the only substances entering the container, since water is used for anal cleansing and households predominantly have a piped water connection, while the small proportion of the population that use toilet tissue for wiping usually dispose of it in trash bins with other types of solid waste. According to Koppelaar et al (2018), an average of 58.6 L/cap/day of water enter the sewage container (C w ) in developing countries. The input values used for calculating Q 3 , i.e., emptied volume, number of users and emptying frequency, were the average value for each category based on the household questionnaire and triangulated with data from the container emptying contractors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Key assumptions made were 1) that water inflow is similar for septic tanks and latrines, 2) that type of container does not influence faecal sludge characteristics (based on Eliyan et al (2022)); and 3) that water and excreta are the only substances entering the container, since water is used for anal cleansing and households predominantly have a piped water connection, while the small proportion of the population that use toilet tissue for wiping usually dispose of it in trash bins with other types of solid waste. According to Koppelaar et al (2018) The input values used for calculating Q 3 , i.e., emptied volume, number of users and emptying frequency, were the average value for each category based on the household questionnaire and triangulated with data from the container emptying contractors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the poor quality of the water lagoon due to raw sewage input ((Nixon et al 2007)(Koppelaar et al 2018)(Owusu et al 2023)), surface water collection was performed using an extended pole equipped with a dedicated bucket (made of a clean bright blue plastic easy to identify under microscope imaging for possible source of contamination, and for which control with clean water was also taken; if found in our samples, such bright blue particles were not accounted for). The water collection was performed 2 times (N=4) independently at the same site, and each time two 50mL Falcon tube were filled with water from the bucket, sealed and maintained in a closed cooler for transportation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%