2018
DOI: 10.1049/iet-ifs.2017.0213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Framework for practical and receipt‐free remote voting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Protocols based on homomorphic encryption (Benaloh & Tuinstra, 1994;Sako & Kilian, 1995;Hirt & Sako, 2000;Chow et al, 2008;Wen & Buckland, 2009;Yi & Okamoto, 2013;Xia et al, 2018) share the same vulnerability with those based on mix-net in achieving receipt-freeness. Different from mix-net based protocols which are more suitable for elections with multiple candidates, homomorphic encryption based protocols are recommended to be deployed in "YES/NO" voting due to its linear growth cost related to the number of candidates (Aditya et al, 2003).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Protocols based on homomorphic encryption (Benaloh & Tuinstra, 1994;Sako & Kilian, 1995;Hirt & Sako, 2000;Chow et al, 2008;Wen & Buckland, 2009;Yi & Okamoto, 2013;Xia et al, 2018) share the same vulnerability with those based on mix-net in achieving receipt-freeness. Different from mix-net based protocols which are more suitable for elections with multiple candidates, homomorphic encryption based protocols are recommended to be deployed in "YES/NO" voting due to its linear growth cost related to the number of candidates (Aditya et al, 2003).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By using the mask, vote-buyers are blocked from the voting process. However, a recent study (Xia et al, 2018) showed that Masked Ballot is vulnerable to shifting vote attack and proposed an improvement based on it.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Receipt-freeness refers to the incapability of a voter to prove that he voted in a certain approach to any attackers with remained verifiability. Generally there exist two cryptographic tools to achieve receipt-freeness: homomorphic encryption [20][21][22][23][24] and Mix-net [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, both the increases in the block size and chain length aggravate the time cost of retrieving for a certain block in the blockchain. In [24], the authors introduced a framework for practical and receipt-free remote voting. However, their scheme has two limitations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%