2011
DOI: 10.2514/1.c001003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Framework for Establishing Limits of Tabular Aerodynamic Models for Flight Dynamics Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous works 19,20 substantiated the limitations of tabular models when comparing to CFD and flight tests data, and this motivates the current study. The overall objective is to put in place a framework of different low-order models for representation of non-linear unsteady aerodynamic loads.…”
Section: -18mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Previous works 19,20 substantiated the limitations of tabular models when comparing to CFD and flight tests data, and this motivates the current study. The overall objective is to put in place a framework of different low-order models for representation of non-linear unsteady aerodynamic loads.…”
Section: -18mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Works by the co-authors 20,30 have pinpointed the presence of vortical features in the flow field at 15.0…”
Section: B Standard Dynamics Model Aircraftmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29 This model has been used for two previous studies related to dynamic derivatives. First, the development of a flight dynamics aerodynamic model using CFD was reported in Ghoreyshi et al 30 Forced manoeuvres were used to evaluate the applicability of the dynamic derivative model. The results of a study that considers the variation of the dynamic derivatives with various aerodynamic and motion parameters, based on time domain simulations is reported in Da Ronch et al 20 A block structured mesh was generated for the use with the PMB and HB solvers and it is shown in Fig.…”
Section: B Standard Dynamics Model Aircraftmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This time lag cannot be predicted using Bryan's model because the quasi-steady lift change is synchronized with the angle of attack change. Bryan's initial model was later modified to include acceleration derivatives to somehow model the effects from the rate of change of incidence and sideslip angles in time, although this modified model cannot predict the unsteady forces and moments of a rapid maneuvering aircraft in the presence of shock waves and vortical flows [16]. Indeed, the unsteady aerodynamic forces and moments not only depend on the instantaneous states but also their time histories [57,58].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%