2016
DOI: 10.1007/s40032-016-0337-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Framework for Automated GD&T Inspection Using 3D Scanner

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is a characterization of the object traits, such as straightness, angularity, parallelism, size, that manufactured objects must meet in order to be considered valid. Alternatively, a free-form surface analysis such as the one showed in Pathak et al [ 12 ] can be used, but often a complete definition and evaluation of these traits is complex, time consuming and can barely account for basic defects such as missing or extra material due to small errors in the manufacturing process. Besides this, depending on the acquisition system, retrieved 3D objects may contain synthetic errors that need to be accounted for when evaluating the measurements, making difficult to change the acquisition system without updating the evaluation method.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a characterization of the object traits, such as straightness, angularity, parallelism, size, that manufactured objects must meet in order to be considered valid. Alternatively, a free-form surface analysis such as the one showed in Pathak et al [ 12 ] can be used, but often a complete definition and evaluation of these traits is complex, time consuming and can barely account for basic defects such as missing or extra material due to small errors in the manufacturing process. Besides this, depending on the acquisition system, retrieved 3D objects may contain synthetic errors that need to be accounted for when evaluating the measurements, making difficult to change the acquisition system without updating the evaluation method.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We do not address in this paper the defect detection process which has to be applied after reconstruction to compare the test object against a reference model. Recent works in this area, like [ 20 ] or [ 21 ], show promising results even in difficult tasks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4] But nowadays, use of noncontact 3D scanner is increasing for CAD modeling, drawing of physical components and part inspection purposes. [5][6][7] The laser-scanning technology has an inbuilt capacity to capture the pro¯le of a component, and therefore, has received considerable appreciation in the industry. It can capture data with fast speed and can acquire thousands to millions of 3D point data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%