2019
DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.9b02850
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Framework Conversion of Oxido-Bridged Dinuclear Ruthenium Complexes

Abstract: Syntheses, properties, and reactions of hydroxido-or oxido-bridged dinuclear ruthenium complexes bearing a tridentate auxiliary ligand, ethylbis(2-pyridylmethyl)amine (ebpma) or benzylbis(2-pyridylmethyl)amine (bbpma), have been investigated. Reduction reactions of a singly oxidob r i d g e d d i r u t h e n i u m c o m p l e x b e a r i n g e b p m a , [{Ru III,IV Cl 2 (ebpma)} 2 (μ-O)] + ([2 Cl ] + ), by zinc in acetonitrile afforded an acetonitrile-substituted singly oxido-bridged complex in the Ru III −Ru … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…23 As is known, compound 2 shows the smallest Ru–Ru distance value of 2.3808(6) Å for all known ESBO diruthenium compounds reported thus far (Table 1). 6–31 As shown in Fig. 2, the main structure of compounds 4 and 5 are isostructural, and the number of lattice water molecules is four and two for 1 and 2 , respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…23 As is known, compound 2 shows the smallest Ru–Ru distance value of 2.3808(6) Å for all known ESBO diruthenium compounds reported thus far (Table 1). 6–31 As shown in Fig. 2, the main structure of compounds 4 and 5 are isostructural, and the number of lattice water molecules is four and two for 1 and 2 , respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the characterization of Ru–Ru bonds with short distances and high bond orders in electron-poor high-valent Ru 2 centers has boosted experimental and theoretical research. 5,29 To date, ESBO Ru⋯Ru interactions seem to present a broader range of distances (2.4334–3.733 Å, see Table 1) 6–32 than related paddle–wheel Ru–Ru bonds, which span a range from 2.248 to 2.2532(2.499(3)) Å. 1,2 In general, Ru⋯Ru interactions depend primarily on the electronic configuration of the Ru 2 core as well as the type of ligands; therefore, it is meaningfully interesting to search for the lower limit of ESBO Ru–Ru bond distance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two chlorido ligands also bound to the zinc(II) center, which was contained in the synthesis process, and zinc(II) forms a four-coordinate pseudotetrahedral geometry alongside two terminal chlorido ligands. The coordination manner, in which pyrazine locates at the trans to pyridine, is the same as the singly oxido-bridged complex with chlorido ligands, [{Ru III,IV Cl 2 (Rbpma)} 2 (μ-O)] + . From the viewpoint of the electrostatic characters of ligands, the geometry seems not favorable; however, there would be other factors, e.g., the stabilization of pyrazine owing to the Ru(dπ)-pz(π)-Ru(dπ) interactions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In methanol under air, the chlorido ligand(s) was­(were) substituted for methoxido ligand(s) without framework conversion, affording [{Ru II,III (Rbpma)} 2 (μ-Cl) m (μ-OCH 3 ) 3– m ] 2+ ( m = 1, 2) . In contrast, in the presence of water, the triply bridged framework was converted into the singly bridged framework, bridged by an oxido ligand coming from water, [{Ru III,IV Cl 2 (Rbpma)} 2 (μ-O)] + . In this work, the reactions of [{Ru II,II (bbpma)} 2 (μ-Cl) 3 ] + ([ 1 ] + ) with pyrazine (pz), the N -donor ambidentate ligand, which could enable multinucleation, were attempted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electronic transition spectrum of [ 1 CO3 ] + in the UV-vis-NIR region in CH 3 CN showed two intense absorption bands at 249 and 362 nm and a weak broad band at ∼1067 nm (see the black broken line in Figure , as well as Table , both presented later in this work). Each absorption band was attributed to the π­(py)−π*­(py) transition of ebpma, the MLCT from dπ­(Ru) to π*­(py), , and the transitions on the {Ru 2 (μ-O) 2 } core, , respectively. The λ max values of the MLCT and the transition on the {Ru 2 (μ-O) 2 } core were in longer wavelengths for [ 1 CO3 ] + than those of [ 1 CH3COO ] 2+ and [ 1 NO3 ] 2+ , since the stronger electron-donating carbonate destabilized the dπ­(Ru) orbital energy level.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%