2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.acha.2013.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frames of multi-windowed exponentials on subsets ofRd

Abstract: Given discrete subsets Λ j ⊂ R d , j = 1, . . . , q, consider the set of windowed exponentials q j=1 {g j (x)e 2π i λ,x : λ ∈ Λ j } on L 2 (Ω). We show that a necessary and sufficient condition for the windows g j to form a frame of windowed exponentials for L 2 (Ω) with some Λ j is that 0 < m max j∈ J |g j | M almost everywhere on Ω for some subset J of {1, . . . , q}. If Ω is unbounded, we show that there is no frame of windowed exponentials if the Lebesgue measure of Ω is infinite. If Ω is unbounded but of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the sampling problem for P W s a , 0 ă s ă 1 2 , is equivalent to study windowed frames for L 2 a . The following result, due to C.-K. Lai [Lai11] (see also [GL14]) implies that we cannot have real sampling sequences for P W s a . Hence, we cannot obtain an analogue of (18) with point evaluations of the function instead of point evaluations of its fractional Laplacian.…”
Section: Reconstruction Formulas and Sampling In P W S Amentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Therefore, the sampling problem for P W s a , 0 ă s ă 1 2 , is equivalent to study windowed frames for L 2 a . The following result, due to C.-K. Lai [Lai11] (see also [GL14]) implies that we cannot have real sampling sequences for P W s a . Hence, we cannot obtain an analogue of (18) with point evaluations of the function instead of point evaluations of its fractional Laplacian.…”
Section: Reconstruction Formulas and Sampling In P W S Amentioning
confidence: 96%
“…◻ Therefore, the sampling problem for PW s a , 0 < s < 1 2 , is equivalent to study windowed frames for L 2 a . The following result, due to [16] (see also [14]) implies that we cannot have real sampling sequences for PW s a . Hence, we cannot obtain an analogue of (18) with point evaluations of the function instead of point evaluations of its fractional Laplacian.…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Theorem [14,16] The family g( )e i n n ∈Λ is a frame for L 2 a for some sequence of points Λ = { n } n∈ℤ ⊆ ℝ if and only if there exist positive constants m, M such that m ≤ g( ) ≤ M .…”
Section: Definition 54 Letmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More generally, if 0 < m ≤ g ≤ M < ∞ on Ω, then E(g, Λ) forms a frame for L 2 (Ω). In [20] (See also [29]), the class of all admissible windows {g 1 , ..., g N } were completely classified. The necessary and sufficient condition for {g 1 , ..., g N } to be admissible for L 2 (Ω) is that there exists c > 0 with the property that max {j: g j ∞<∞} |g j | ≥ c > 0. a.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If {g 1 , ..., g N } is admissible, it is known that (see [20]) one can produce a frame of multi-windowed exponentials by taking Λ j in an oversampling manner in the sense that the (Beurling) density of Λ j are strictly greater than the measure of Ω.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%