2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2021.102380
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frames, fantasies, and culture: Applying and comparing different methodologies for identifying energy imaginaries in American policy discourse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Beyond support or opposition based on type of technology or energy infrastructure, there are a wide variety of project characteristics that may in uence public preferences. In public discourse, large-scale energy projects are routinely framed in ways that emphasize speci c risks or bene ts to local communities, and support or opposition to projects is often tied to narratives about these risks and bene ts (Bjärstig et al, 2022;Bollman, 2022). At the individual level, narratives help individuals make sense of uncertainty, in uence cognition, and support or challenge existing power relations and policy outcomes (Constantino & Weber, 2021).…”
Section: Characteristics Of Large-scale Energy Projectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beyond support or opposition based on type of technology or energy infrastructure, there are a wide variety of project characteristics that may in uence public preferences. In public discourse, large-scale energy projects are routinely framed in ways that emphasize speci c risks or bene ts to local communities, and support or opposition to projects is often tied to narratives about these risks and bene ts (Bjärstig et al, 2022;Bollman, 2022). At the individual level, narratives help individuals make sense of uncertainty, in uence cognition, and support or challenge existing power relations and policy outcomes (Constantino & Weber, 2021).…”
Section: Characteristics Of Large-scale Energy Projectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… (4) Generating Knowledge and Tools for Just Transitions Finally, the collection does important work to advance a more just renewable transition. Contributions do so in political ecology's more critical vein—particularly in developing a sharper analysis of the terrain of political power in renewable energy development, rising areas of contention and alternative visions of renewable transition emerging in the field (Bollman, 2022; Hudlet-Vazquez et al, 2022). Some also make creative interventions in political ecology's more engaged and praxis-oriented mode, working with movement partners to hone engaged approaches and toolkits.…”
Section: Key Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%