2003
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-39718-2_49
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FrameNet Meets the Semantic Web: Lexical Semantics for the Web

Abstract: Abstract. This paper describes FrameNet [9,1,3], an online lexical resource for English based on the principles of frame semantics [5,7,2]. We provide a data category specification for frame semantics and FrameNet annotations in an RDF-based language. More specifically, we provide an RDF markup for lexical units, defined as a relation between a lemma and a semantic frame, and frame-to-frame relations, namely Inheritance and Subframes. The paper includes simple examples of FrameNet annotated sentences in an XML… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2009) and even English is lacking domain-specific frame-based resources. Possible inroads are cross-lingual semantic annotation transfer (Padó and Lapata 2009;Hartmann, Eckle-Kohler, and Gurevych 2016) or linking FrameNet to other lexical-semantic or ontological resources (Narayanan et al 2003;Tonelli and Pighin 2009;Laparra and Rigau 2010;Gurevych et al 2012, inter alia). But while the arguably simpler task of PropBankbased Semantic Role Labeling has been successfully addressed by unsupervised approaches (Lang and Lapata 2010;Titov and Klementiev 2011), fully unsupervised framebased semantic annotation exhibits far more challenges, starting with the preliminary step of automatically inducing a set of semantic frame definitions that would drive a subsequent text annotation.…”
Section: Application To Unsupervised Semantic Frame Inductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2009) and even English is lacking domain-specific frame-based resources. Possible inroads are cross-lingual semantic annotation transfer (Padó and Lapata 2009;Hartmann, Eckle-Kohler, and Gurevych 2016) or linking FrameNet to other lexical-semantic or ontological resources (Narayanan et al 2003;Tonelli and Pighin 2009;Laparra and Rigau 2010;Gurevych et al 2012, inter alia). But while the arguably simpler task of PropBankbased Semantic Role Labeling has been successfully addressed by unsupervised approaches (Lang and Lapata 2010;Titov and Klementiev 2011), fully unsupervised framebased semantic annotation exhibits far more challenges, starting with the preliminary step of automatically inducing a set of semantic frame definitions that would drive a subsequent text annotation.…”
Section: Application To Unsupervised Semantic Frame Inductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, representing lexical resources in RDF does not per se make them semantically interoperable. Consider, for instance, existing conversions of WordNet and FrameNet [26,22], where a simple mapping to RDF is provided, and augmented with OWL semantics so that reasoning could be applied to the structure of the resource. However, the formats chosen for the RDF versions of WordNet and FrameNet are specific to the underlying data models of WordNet and FrameNet.…”
Section: Representing Lexical-semantic Resources As Linked Data: Lemonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, sentences that refer to purchases could be mapped into purchase-specific frames with roles like seller, buyer, goods, amount, etc., regardless of whether the sentence is active or passive and whether the verb is "buy", "acquire", etc. Obviously this is a very difficult task, especially because there are still only small-scale training corpora available (see, e.g., PropBank [82] and FrameNet [96]). …”
Section: Technical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%