2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.05.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frame rate required for speckle tracking echocardiography: A quantitative clinical study with open-source, vendor-independent software

Abstract: Objectives: To determine the optimal frame rate at which reliable heart walls velocities can be assessed by speckle tracking.Background: Assessing left ventricular function with speckle tracking is useful in patient diagnosis but requires a temporal resolution that can follow myocardial motion. In this study we investigated the effect of different frame rates on the accuracy of speckle tracking results, highlighting the temporal resolution where reliable results can be obtained. Material and methods:27 patient… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All patients in our study were at rest with a heartbeat rate range of 31–115 beats/min. In a recent study, we have shown that a frame rate of >40 frames/s is sufficient for reliable speckle tracking . The automated algorithm also showed similar levels of disagreement for the two acquired frame rates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All patients in our study were at rest with a heartbeat rate range of 31–115 beats/min. In a recent study, we have shown that a frame rate of >40 frames/s is sufficient for reliable speckle tracking . The automated algorithm also showed similar levels of disagreement for the two acquired frame rates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…In a recent study, we have shown that a frame rate of >40 frames/s is sufficient for reliable speckle tracking. 24 The automated algorithm also showed similar levels of disagreement for the two acquired frame rates. However, at higher heart rates, for example during stress tests when the heart rates are higher by twofold to threefold, the time intervals shorten.…”
Section: Study Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…D was recorded in the parasternal long axis view (PLAX) to ensure the measurements were perpendicular to the vessel center-line. M-mode was chosen in preference to B-mode to maximize the frame rate (Negoita et al 2016 ) and the M-mode cursor was placed immediately downstream of the sino-tubular junction. U was measured in the apical five chamber view (A5CH) using pulse wave (PW) Doppler with a 5 mm sample volume placed in the center of the aorta as close as possible to the location of the D measurement.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diameter was recorded in 2D M-mode to achieve tracking with a high temporal resolution (as opposed to Bmode (2D) which would make the tracking highly dependent on acquisition frame rate [5]) by placing the cursor downstream of the sino-tubular junction with the Mmode line as perpendicular as possible to the aortic wall. Blood velocity was measured with pulsed wave Doppler and the sample volume was placed in the ascending aorta, as close as possible to the measurement location for diameter.…”
Section: Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%