2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10623-018-0472-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frame difference families and resolvable balanced incomplete block designs

Abstract: Frame difference families, which can be obtained via a careful use of cyclotomic conditions attached to strong difference families, play an important role in direct constructions for resolvable balanced incomplete block designs. We establish asymptotic existences for several classes of frame difference families. As corollaries new infinite families of 1-rotational (pq + 1, p + 1, 1)-RBIBDs over F + p × F + q are derived, and the existence of (125q + 1, 6, 1)-RBIBDs is discussed. We construct (v, 8, 1)-RBIBDs f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The concept of SDF was introduced by Buratti [13] and revisited in [36]. Similar to what has been done in [18,20,21], here we will focus on three particular SDFs with some special “patterns” and we will look for second components: the main ingredients for this purpose will be given by PSs and APSs. More precisely we will use the following three SDFs: true0.33emright(double-struckZ3,4,4)SDF:normalΣ1center=left[[1,1,1,1]].right(double-struckZ5,5,4)SDF:normalΣ2center=left[[0,1,1,1,1]].right(double-struckZ45,5,4)SDF:normalΣ3center=left[[0,1,1,1,1],[0,3,7,13,30],[0,3,7,13,30],[0,3,7,13,30],rightcenterleft[0,3,7,13,30],[0,5,14,26,34],[0,5,14,26,34],[0,5,14,26,34],[0,5,14,26,34]].…”
Section: Applications To Optical Orthogonal Codesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of SDF was introduced by Buratti [13] and revisited in [36]. Similar to what has been done in [18,20,21], here we will focus on three particular SDFs with some special “patterns” and we will look for second components: the main ingredients for this purpose will be given by PSs and APSs. More precisely we will use the following three SDFs: true0.33emright(double-struckZ3,4,4)SDF:normalΣ1center=left[[1,1,1,1]].right(double-struckZ5,5,4)SDF:normalΣ2center=left[[0,1,1,1,1]].right(double-struckZ45,5,4)SDF:normalΣ3center=left[[0,1,1,1,1],[0,3,7,13,30],[0,3,7,13,30],[0,3,7,13,30],rightcenterleft[0,3,7,13,30],[0,5,14,26,34],[0,5,14,26,34],[0,5,14,26,34],[0,5,14,26,34]].…”
Section: Applications To Optical Orthogonal Codesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The elder constructions are surveyed in [2]. More recent constructions can be found in [8,9,11,14,15,21,22,25]. Here one often tries to have each ∆ g B a complete system of representatives for the cosets of the subgroup of F * q of index µ, namely the group C µ of non-zero µ-th powers of F q .…”
Section: Difference Packings Via Strong Difference Familiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relative difference families have been widely used to construct various kinds of 2‐designs (see [4,10,14] for example). A 2‐(v,k,λ) design is a pair (V,MJX-tex-caligraphicscriptA) where V is a set of v points and MJX-tex-caligraphicscriptA is a collection of k‐subsets of X (called blocks ) such that every 2‐subset of X is contained in exactly λ blocks of MJX-tex-caligraphicscriptA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When k{8,9}, it is shown in [1, table 3.3] that a 2‐(v,k,λ) design exists if and only if λv(v1)00.3em(mod0.3emk(k1)) and λ(v1)00.3em(mod0.3emk1) with 3 definite exceptions and 160 possible exceptions. Seven of these possible exceptions, that is, (v,k,λ){(624,8,1),(1576,8,1),(2025,9,1),(765,9,2),(1845,9,2),(459,9,4),(783,9,4)}, were ruled out recently in [13,14] via strong difference families. Following the work in [13], we construct eight more new 2‐(v,k,λ) designs in Section 2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%