2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.comnet.2016.05.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frame-based forward error correction using content-dependent coding for video streaming applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To verify the performance of the proposed scheme, the PFR and peak signal‐to‐noise ratio (PSNR) results were compared with those obtained using 2 other PFR‐based schemes, namely frame‐level FEC and expanding‐window FEC . According to the analytical results given in Section 4.4, the window size of sliding‐window scheme was 2 frames.…”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…To verify the performance of the proposed scheme, the PFR and peak signal‐to‐noise ratio (PSNR) results were compared with those obtained using 2 other PFR‐based schemes, namely frame‐level FEC and expanding‐window FEC . According to the analytical results given in Section 4.4, the window size of sliding‐window scheme was 2 frames.…”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, expanding‐window FEC takes account of the video coding dependency at the FEC coding stage . In particular, the current video frame and all the preceding frames are used to construct a coding window in such a way that the window continuously expands until the entire GOP is covered . By adopting such an approach, the high‐priority frames are protected by multiple windows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations