2008
DOI: 10.1080/02664760802271389
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frailty models and copulas: similarities and differences

Abstract: Copulas and frailty models are important tools to model bivariate survival data. Equivalence between Archimedean copula models and shared frailty models, e.g., between the Clayton-Oakes copula model and the shared gamma frailty model, has often been claimed in the literature. In this note we show that, in both models, there is indeed the well known equivalence between the copula functions; the modeling of the marginal survival functions, however, is quite different. The latter fact leads to different joint sur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, copula models, often used to assess the association between event times, in general, cannot capture the heterogeneity as frailty models can. For more details regarding this aspect we refer to the paper by Goethals et al [34]. Bivariate copula models for CS data including limiting distributions are discussed in Wang and Ding [35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, copula models, often used to assess the association between event times, in general, cannot capture the heterogeneity as frailty models can. For more details regarding this aspect we refer to the paper by Goethals et al [34]. Bivariate copula models for CS data including limiting distributions are discussed in Wang and Ding [35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is not the case for frailty models, although there are similarities between frailty models and Archimedean copulas (Goethals et al 2008). This is not the case for frailty models, although there are similarities between frailty models and Archimedean copulas (Goethals et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…, t d ) is different from the 'classical copula' where the idea is to capture dependence through the copula function but in a way that is not related to the marginal distributions. For a detailed discussion, including examples, see Goethals et al (2008). Another important difference between copula models and frailty models is that frailty models are conditional models (in fact dependence between observations in one cluster is generated through heterogeneity between clusters (the frailty density captures the heterogeneity)).…”
Section: Frailty Models and Copula Modelsmentioning
confidence: 98%