e thank Dr. Kuschner for his correspondence and appreciate the insights he provided. In the original article, "Frailty Among Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Recipients: Epidemiology and Propensity Score-weighted Analysis of Effect on In-hospital Postoperative Outcomes," we conducted a retrospective analysis of the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) to compare medical comorbidities and inpatient outcomes among primary total joint arthroplasty of the hip and knee (TJA) recipients with and without frailty. 1 As highlighted in Dr. Kuschner's letter, the cohort of interest was identified through a list of previously reported comorbidities. Given the nature of the study and the use of an administrative database, these comorbidities, and subsequently frail patients, were identified by mining the deidentified records for specific International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes, as reported in the methods section. In general, the specific codes are entered in patient records based on previous or current diagnoses during hospital admission and are subsequently reported in the NIS. 2 While this methodology has limitations, particularly in code and diagnosis accuracy, the database is well-suited for epidemiologic studies because it allows for a substantial and robust analysis of national trends with a large number of hospital encounters. As such, the study's aim was to delineate the medical comorbidities commonly encountered in frail TJA recipients and highlight the worse in-hospital outcomes within this cohort. We hope these findings highlight the need to develop care optimization pathways for this patient population, similar to the efforts made for obese TJA candidates. Given that optimization starts with identification of the at-risk population, we agree with Dr. Kuschner, whose position is supported by a considerable evidence base, that grip strength is an important element of frailty and that a handgrip dynamometer serves as an effective tool for the screening of this critical comorbidity. [3][4][5][6][7][8] Moreover, as Dr. Kuschner noted, multiple studies have demonstrated that handgrip strength alone, as an indicator of underlying frailty and sarcopenia, is associated with worse clinical outcomes after TJA, providing an evidence base for its use as a valuable predictor of outcomes after TJA. 9,10 Grip strength can, hence, serve as an effective screening metric for patient optimization while also informing both clinicians and patients about the potential increased risk after these procedures.In summary, we support measures that can better help identify frailty, given its neglect in the clinical setting as an important risk factor for outcomes after TJA. As an inexpensive, simple tool that can be used in any practice setting, we agree that using hand dynamometers should be encouraged.