1997
DOI: 10.1007/s001530050081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fragments of $HA$ based on $\Sigma_1$ -induction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recall Wehmeier's result, iΠ 1 exp, where exp is the Π 2 sentence which says the exponentiation function is total. His proof is based on constructing a two-node Kripke model of iΠ 1 such that its root is not a model of exp, see [W1,Lemma 10]. Here we prove a stronger independence result.…”
Section: An Intuitionistic Theory Tmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Recall Wehmeier's result, iΠ 1 exp, where exp is the Π 2 sentence which says the exponentiation function is total. His proof is based on constructing a two-node Kripke model of iΠ 1 such that its root is not a model of exp, see [W1,Lemma 10]. Here we prove a stronger independence result.…”
Section: An Intuitionistic Theory Tmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…T h e o r e m (WEHMEIER [15]). Suppose that 1x1 t-i E 3 y A ( f , y ) , where A is an arbitrary formula of the language of L whose free variables are among c and y.…”
Section: Harnik's Results Can Be Reformulated Thusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wehmeier [29] used Kleene's realizability to characterize provably total functions of ¦ ½ : "each of them is primitive recursive". This had (already) been proven by Damnjanovic [7] using so-called strictly primitive recursive realizability (see also [9]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%