Fragment reattachment of fractured anterior teeth in a young patient with a 1.5-year follow-up

Ninawe, Nupur; Doifode, Deoyani; Khandelwal, Vishal; Nayak, Prathibha Anand

doi:10.1136/bcr-2013-009399

Cited by 6 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Also, another study reported a long term performance of this technique better than that of direct composite restoration (Cavalleri & Zerman 1995). If the fracture segment is about 50% of the crown a post treatment is recommended for better prognosis (Ninawe et al 2013). Many factors contribute to good prognosis of fracture reattachment procedure.…”

Section: Prognosismentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The treatment of the fracture teeth depends -a great extent -on the type of fracture if it is simple or complicated. Treatment of simple fracture was done either by direct composite restoration or a full coverage crown, while in the complicated cases root canal treatment with post and core and may be followed by full coverage porcelain crown was the treatment of choice (Ninawe et al 2013, Pavone et al 2015. The disadvantages of the first technique are the instability of the composite shade and long term discoloration while the second technique is too aggressive scarifying the tooth vitality and possible wear of the opposing dentition (Pavone et al 2015).…”

Section: Treatment Modalitiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The lesser the dehydration period the better will be the prognosis (Shetty et al 2012). Cooperation of the patient and his or her understanding of the advantages and disadvantages of this treatment modality play an important role for success of such treatment (Ninawe et al 2013). …”

Section: Prognosismentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Many factors contribute to good prognosis of fracture reattachment procedure. Systematic approach to the coronal fracture has a positive impact on the prognosis of the treatment (Ninawe et al 2013). Perfect adaptation and accurate fit is mandatory for the success of fracture reattachment procedure (Goenka et al 2012).…”

Section: Prognosismentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Whatever the cause of the trauma, its intensity and extensiveness cannot be expected (Sargod& Bhat 2010). Fortunately, dental trauma usually affects only one tooth (Ninawe et al 2013). Among patient seeking for treatment of non-carious lesion 31% was suffered from tooth fracture.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Fracture tooth reattachment

Hassan

2018

IJDR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Anterior teeth fractures occur daily, with the main patient demand to restore esthetically the resultant defect. There is nothing more esthetic than the tooth itself. Many techniques were described to use the fractured piece to restore this defect in case of accurate fit. The objective of this article is to summarize these techniques to give the dental practitioners the opportunity to restore the fractured tooth more conservatively and in the same time more esthetically. In addition, it throws light on the prevalence and etiology of tooth fracture. Frontal teeth are subjected to traumas more than other teeth in the mouth. These traumas may lead to tooth fracture with or without pulp involvement. In attempts to restore the fractured tooth in more esthetic and conservative manner, the fractured piece may be used as a restorative material. This treatment modality has gained increased popularity among dental practitioner due to the continuous development in the adhesive field. Several techniques were used. These techniques include, simple reattachment, external chamfer, over contouring, internal dentin bevel, and internal enamel bevel. All these techniques try to afford the highest fracture resistance accompanied with the least possible tooth preparation. Combination of two or more technique would result in better performance.

show abstract

Section: Prognosismentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Treatment Modalitiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Prognosismentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Prognosismentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Fracture tooth reattachment

Hassan

2018

IJDR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Multidisciplinary Management of Complicated Crown-Root Fracture of an Anterior Tooth Undergoing Apexification

Meşe

Akçay

Yaşa

et al. 2015

Case Reports in Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this case report was to present the multidisciplinary management of a subgingival crown-root fracture of a patient undergoing apexification treatment. A 12-year-old male patient was referred to the pediatric dentistry clinic with an extensive tooth fracture of the right permanent maxillary lateral incisor. Clinical and radiographic examinations revealed the presence of a complicated crown-root fracture, which had elongated to the buccal subgingival area. The dental history disclosed that the apexification procedure had been started to be performed after his first trauma experience and he had neglected his appointment. The coronal fragment was gently extracted; endodontic treatment was performed; flap surgery was performed to make the fracture line visible. The coronal fragment was reattached to the root fragment with a dual-cure luting composite. A fiber post was stabilized and the access cavity of the tooth was restored with composite resin. At the end of the 24th month, the tooth was asymptomatic, functionally, esthetically acceptable and had no periapical pathology. It is important for the patients undergoing apexification treatment to keep their appointments because of the fracture risk. Restoration of the fractured tooth by preparing retention grooves and a bonding fiber-reinforced post are effective and necessary approaches for successful management.

show abstract

Role of adhesive attachments in traumatic dental injury

Basudan

Zagzoog

Alshehri

et al. 2021

Int J Community Med Public Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Crown root cracking is uncommon, accounting for less than 7% of irreversible damage. All the hard tissues of the teeth (crust, dentin, and cementum), as well as the pulp and periodontal ligament, are commonly involved in these complicated fractures. The care of such instances offers major biological hurdles, and success is dependent on considering a variety of regenerative, endodontic, and temporal variables. Numerous clinical investigations demonstrate that adhesive coronal attachment might be an essential therapy for fractured teeth with crown roots. Because it maintains the original tooth, this technique may save the gums and decrease the time and expense of therapy. Before considering adhesive attachments for dental fractures, several factors should be considered-the site and size of the fracture, the fracture pattern, and the position of traumatized teeth. The aim of the article was to review the role of adhesive attachments in a traumatic dental injury.

show abstract

Fragment reattachment of fractured anterior teeth in a young patient with a 1.5-year follow-up

Cited by 6 publications

References 6 publications

Fracture tooth reattachment

Fracture tooth reattachment

Multidisciplinary Management of Complicated Crown-Root Fracture of an Anterior Tooth Undergoing Apexification

Role of adhesive attachments in traumatic dental injury

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About