2004
DOI: 10.1021/jm0495778
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fragment-Based Lead Discovery Using X-ray Crystallography

Abstract: Fragment screening offers an alternative to traditional screening for discovering new leads in drug discovery programs. This paper describes a fragment screening methodology based on high throughput X-ray crystallography. The method is illustrated against five proteins (p38 MAP kinase, CDK2, thrombin, ribonuclease A, and PTP1B). The fragments identified have weak potency (>100 microM) but are efficient binders relative to their size and may therefore represent suitable starting points for evolution to good qua… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

12
333
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 394 publications
(347 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
12
333
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We would emphasize that this is not nonspecific binding that is occurring, but because the fragment has low molecular complexity it is able to bind to complementary protein motifs in several locations. This is consistent with the fact that the electron densities of the fragments are typically very well defined and that, although they exhibit very low binding affinity, with K d often in the millimolar range, the interactions they make are highly efficient (27). Indeed, these crystal structures of protein-fragment complexes are a good basis to develop novel chemical tools that would probe the function of these secondary binding sites and experimentally confirm their role, if any, in biological processes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We would emphasize that this is not nonspecific binding that is occurring, but because the fragment has low molecular complexity it is able to bind to complementary protein motifs in several locations. This is consistent with the fact that the electron densities of the fragments are typically very well defined and that, although they exhibit very low binding affinity, with K d often in the millimolar range, the interactions they make are highly efficient (27). Indeed, these crystal structures of protein-fragment complexes are a good basis to develop novel chemical tools that would probe the function of these secondary binding sites and experimentally confirm their role, if any, in biological processes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…This resulted in 5,590 holo X-ray crystal structures, comprising 4,950 distinct compounds and 24 protein targets. The exact protocols and screening cascades that led to the data presented here will have varied according to the target, but in broad lines our approach has been described by Hartshorn et al (27,28). In some cases we had collected data for different mutant forms of a protein, and in these cases data from all forms was used.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Broad spectrum tyrosine kinase inhibitors exist, but FGFR is never the most potently inhibited kinase and such mixed inhibitors fail to inhibit FGFR completely because of intervening kinase activities and their associated toxicities. Starting with fragment-derived hits, we used a structure-based design (25)(26)(27) to optimize lead molecules to potent FGFR inhibitors with selectivity against VEGFR2, which shares 57% sequence identity with the kinase domain of FGFR1-3 and 54% with that of FGFR4. Further optimization of pharmacokinetic properties resulted in a series of imidazopyridine leads, the properties of which are described here.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, MCSS molecular probe maps can be used to derive active site pharmacophore models [29]. Somewhat analogous experimental molecular probe mapping and fragment-based ligand discovery approaches have shown success [30][31][32][33][34][35][36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%