2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0001-4575(01)00107-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fragility versus excessive crash involvement as determinants of high death rates per vehicle-mile of travel among older drivers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

13
220
2
8

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 400 publications
(243 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
13
220
2
8
Order By: Relevance
“…A previous study by Newgard (2008) similarly found that young and old victims were more likely to be seriously injured, and that the risk for serious injury rose more steeply after the age of 50. The positive relationship between age and severity is traditionally associated with the greater fragility of elder victims (Li et al, 2003), whereby physical decline would be intensified from the age of fifty onwards.…”
Section: Coefficient Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A previous study by Newgard (2008) similarly found that young and old victims were more likely to be seriously injured, and that the risk for serious injury rose more steeply after the age of 50. The positive relationship between age and severity is traditionally associated with the greater fragility of elder victims (Li et al, 2003), whereby physical decline would be intensified from the age of fifty onwards.…”
Section: Coefficient Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As individuals grow older, they are more likely to experience a decline in cognitive function that can affect their ability to safely operate a motor vehicle, potentially putting themselves and others at risk. In fact, drivers over the age of 65 have a higher rate of motor vehicle collisions per mile driven than middle-aged drivers (Li et al, 2003) and when injured in a collision, they are more likely to die or sustain serious injury (Zhang et al, 2000, Bédard et al, 2002. Literature to date suggests that cognitive impairment in later life does not predict self-regulation or perceptions of driving abilities (Ball et al, 2006;Crizzle et al, 2013;Kowalski et al, 2011;Molnar & Eby, 2008), and hence the risk to road safety may be particularly concerning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is more evident when an exposure measure (yearly distance driven, for example) is taken into account for calculating risk (Li et al, 2003; 2006). Due to greater vulnerability to injury (reductions in bone strength and fracture tolerance), these figures must be corrected by the so-called "frailty bias" (Li et al, 2003;.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to greater vulnerability to injury (reductions in bone strength and fracture tolerance), these figures must be corrected by the so-called "frailty bias" (Li et al, 2003;. Between 60 and 95% of the increase in death rate per distance travelled for those aged 60 and over can be accounted for by increases in fragility (Li et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%