2022
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.1c00821
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FragExplorer: GRID-Based Fragment Growing and Replacement

Abstract: Understanding which chemical modifications can be made to known ligands is a key aspect of structure-based drug design and one that was pioneered by the software GRID. We developed FragExplorer with the explicit aim of showing GRID users which fragments would best match the GRID molecular interaction fields in a protein binding site, given a bound ligand as a starting point. Users can grow ligands or replace existing moieties; the R-Group Exploration mode identifies all potential R-Groups and searches for repl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The physics-based molecular mechanics-generalized Born with surface area (MM-GBSA) was then used to provide a more accurate score. Further, more recent, examples include FragExplorer, 9 which aims to grow or replace fragments to optimise molecular interaction fields generated by the GRID software, 10 DeepFrag, 11 which predicts appropriate fragment additions using a deep convolutional neural network trained on thousands of known protein-ligand complexes, and DEVELOP, 12 which uses deep generative models to output 3D molecules conditional on provided phamacophoric features of the binding site. However, the employed approximate physics-or knowledgebased approaches to scoring the designs will limit to some extent their ability to predict and optimise binding affinity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The physics-based molecular mechanics-generalized Born with surface area (MM-GBSA) was then used to provide a more accurate score. Further, more recent, examples include FragExplorer, 9 which aims to grow or replace fragments to optimise molecular interaction fields generated by the GRID software, 10 DeepFrag, 11 which predicts appropriate fragment additions using a deep convolutional neural network trained on thousands of known protein-ligand complexes, and DEVELOP, 12 which uses deep generative models to output 3D molecules conditional on provided phamacophoric features of the binding site. However, the employed approximate physics-or knowledgebased approaches to scoring the designs will limit to some extent their ability to predict and optimise binding affinity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The physics-based molecular mechanics-generalized Born with surface area (MM-GBSA) was then used to provide a more accurate score. Further, more recent, examples include FragExplorer, 9 which aims to grow or replace fragments to optimise molecular interaction fields generated by the GRID software, 10 DeepFrag, 11 which predicts appropriate fragment additions using a deep convolutional neural network trained on thousands of known protein-ligand complexes, and DEVELOP, 12 which uses deep generative models to output 3D molecules conditional on provided phamacophoric features of the binding site. However, the employed approximate physics-or knowledgebased approaches to scoring the designs will limit to some extent their ability to predict and optimise binding affinity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The physics-based molecular mechanics-generalised Born with surface area (MM-GBSA) was then used to provide a more accurate score. Further, more recent, examples include FragExplorer 9 , which aims to grow or replace fragments to optimise molecular interaction fields generated by the GRID software 10 , DeepFrag 11 , which predicts appropriate fragment additions using a deep convolutional neural network trained on thousands of known protein-ligand complexes, and DEVELOP 12 , which uses deep generative models to output 3D molecules conditional on provided phamacophoric features of the binding site. However, the employed approximate physics-or knowledge-based approaches to scoring the designs will limit to some extent their ability to predict and optimise binding affinity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%