2008
DOI: 10.1016/s1988-8856(08)70087-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fractures of the tibial pilon. Long-term functional results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with other comparable studies [ 1 , 15 ], the most common technique used in our cohort was ORIF, which was performed more frequently in both type B (73.53%) and C fractures (58.33%) ( p < 0.05). As the use of the definitive external fixation procedure or the two-stage procedure protocol, in combination with ORIF, represents the gold standard of treatment of pilon fractures in cases of associated soft tissue lesions [ 17 27 ], the choice between the one- and two-stage procedure standard protocol in our case series was made in the majority of cases on the basis of the state of the soft tissues ( p < 0.05) according to our institutional protocol and in a few cases on the basis of the preferences and experience of the surgeons involved in the operations. Further, the choice of using the Procallus Fixator or the Hybrid Fixator for definitive treatment (one-stage procedure) instead of the circular frame was mainly made for biomechanical reasons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In line with other comparable studies [ 1 , 15 ], the most common technique used in our cohort was ORIF, which was performed more frequently in both type B (73.53%) and C fractures (58.33%) ( p < 0.05). As the use of the definitive external fixation procedure or the two-stage procedure protocol, in combination with ORIF, represents the gold standard of treatment of pilon fractures in cases of associated soft tissue lesions [ 17 27 ], the choice between the one- and two-stage procedure standard protocol in our case series was made in the majority of cases on the basis of the state of the soft tissues ( p < 0.05) according to our institutional protocol and in a few cases on the basis of the preferences and experience of the surgeons involved in the operations. Further, the choice of using the Procallus Fixator or the Hybrid Fixator for definitive treatment (one-stage procedure) instead of the circular frame was mainly made for biomechanical reasons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the high incidence of complications with poor outcomes reported in pilon fracture management [ 19 , 26 , 27 , 30 , 31 ], several authors [ 19 , 27 , 30 ] have tried to make their surgical approaches less invasive to limit damage of soft tissues. In our cohort, 39 patients (41.49%) showed early and/or late complications, rates comparable to those described in the literature [ 27 , 31 ]. However, 22 cases (23.40%) experienced early minor complications, including superficial infections, pin-track infections, or wound dehiscence, which were effectively treated by periodic medication, sometimes in association with oral antibiotic therapy for a few days.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Typically, remarkable comminution and impaction of the joint surface is associated with these high-energy traumas. [4][5][6] A case series of primary ankle arthrodesis using a retrograde calcaneal nail to treat closed comminuted tibial pilon fractures is presented. Clinical and radiologic outcomes as well as complications were analyzed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%