1975
DOI: 10.1016/0020-1383(75)90006-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fractures of the clavicle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
13
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
4
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relative proportion of females to males increased with age; simple falls were the predominant cause of injury in the elderly. These clinical findings are supported by previous biomechanical studies 14,15 which have suggested that the usual mechanism of the fracture, irrespective of site, is a direct force applied to the point of the shoulder such as occurs during a fall or RTA. As Müller has indicated, 16 classification systems are only of value if they serve as a basis for treatment and can be used to predict outcome.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The relative proportion of females to males increased with age; simple falls were the predominant cause of injury in the elderly. These clinical findings are supported by previous biomechanical studies 14,15 which have suggested that the usual mechanism of the fracture, irrespective of site, is a direct force applied to the point of the shoulder such as occurs during a fall or RTA. As Müller has indicated, 16 classification systems are only of value if they serve as a basis for treatment and can be used to predict outcome.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Oroko et al (1999) studied 41 patients with clavicle fractures and could not demonstrate any relationship between the two. Sankarankutty and Turner (1975) reviewed 215 cases of shortened clavicles, and found no cases exhibiting loss of muscle power at the shoulder.…”
Section: Sternalmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Looking at the finer results it has been reported that conservative management has more chance of mal-union and non-union. 2,[7][8][9][10][11] A pooled data revealed that nonunion was lower in operated group as compared to conservative group, Also showed that 14% of 452 patients in the Non-operative group developed a nonunion, which is Significantly higher (p=0.00001) than the 1.7% rate of Non-union in the 507 patients of the operative group. Symptomatic mal-union was also significantly more common in the nonoperative group (20% in the nonoperative group versus 1.8% in the operative group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Even united or not most patients have good functional outcomes and a high level of patient satisfaction except few where there is functional disability following nonunion. 2,[7][8][9][10][11] As nonoperative treatment are not as favourable as once thought, there is increase trend for internal fixation. [12][13] Besides non-union was lower in operated group as compared to conservative group, pooled data showed that 14% of 452 patients in the nonoperative group developed non-union, which is significantly higher (p=0.00001) than the 1.7% rate of non-union in the 507 patients of the operative group.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%