2018
DOI: 10.1007/s40496-018-0184-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fracture Toughness Testing of Dental Restoratives: a Critical Evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 40 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of an interfacial method such as mini-iFT is suitable for small CAD/CAM block specimens, especially to evaluate the interface properties with high discriminative power. Despite that, there has been some criticism regarding the testing method 37,38) , as high mini-iFT values are often seen, whereas other test methods present different fracture toughness values for the same material 39) . Nevertheless, based on our knowledge, this mini-iFT was the most suitable approach to investigate the present hypotheses, although the mini-iFT values remain to be further validated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of an interfacial method such as mini-iFT is suitable for small CAD/CAM block specimens, especially to evaluate the interface properties with high discriminative power. Despite that, there has been some criticism regarding the testing method 37,38) , as high mini-iFT values are often seen, whereas other test methods present different fracture toughness values for the same material 39) . Nevertheless, based on our knowledge, this mini-iFT was the most suitable approach to investigate the present hypotheses, although the mini-iFT values remain to be further validated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%