2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.prostr.2017.12.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fracture toughness of structural adhesives for the automotive industry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The toughness of the mono-component adhesive was found to be in the range (1.45 ± 0.26) kJ/m 2 . It is emphasized that previous related work by the authors 28 indicated that the quoted toughness does not display substantial variations with the bondline thickness. After conditioning, the T-joints still failed in steady-state fashion and the toughness, which was once again estimated using the ESIS protocol, was reduced of about 29%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The toughness of the mono-component adhesive was found to be in the range (1.45 ± 0.26) kJ/m 2 . It is emphasized that previous related work by the authors 28 indicated that the quoted toughness does not display substantial variations with the bondline thickness. After conditioning, the T-joints still failed in steady-state fashion and the toughness, which was once again estimated using the ESIS protocol, was reduced of about 29%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The results pertaining to the bi-component adhesive displayed a similar pattern, even if the fracture toughness of the pristine joints was higher than that of the mono-component adhesive and was equal to (1.74 ± 0.52) kJ/m 2 ; once again, the results did not show significant dependency on the bondline thickness. 28 After aging, the toughness was lowered by 11%. An overall account on the obtained results is reported in Table 3.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Simultaneously, automobile and adhesive manufacturers have carefully considered and studied the reliability of adhesives in automobiles, where human safety must be guaranteed. The essential basic requirements for automotive structural adhesives are as follows: an elongation performance, in addition to the adhesive strength (i.e., the toughness) [ 19 , 20 , 21 ]; an impact resistance [ 22 , 23 , 24 ]; and a stable performance in the specified operating temperature range [ 25 , 26 , 27 ]. The toughness is required because a vehicle in the driving state experiences various external forces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to their high density of three-dimensional molecular structure, hardly can they resist toward growing of crack. This serious drawback limits their applications in many critical elds where a notable fracture strength or low-temperature toughness is required, such as aerospace and automotive industries [2] [3]. To deplete the severity of this issue, a plethora of different ingredients such as liquid rubbers, core-shell particles (CSIMPs), and rigid organic and inorganic ingredients were used as impact modi ers particles (IMPs) of epoxy resin [4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%