1986
DOI: 10.1016/0148-9062(86)92305-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fracture toughness of stripa granite cores

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the fracture toughness of sandstone and tuff at a/D=0.6 decreased by approximately 38% and 49%, respectively, compared with those at a/D=0.4. A similar trend has been reported by Sun and Ouchterlony for granite [10]. Consequently, a/D of less than 0.4 was used in this study since the fracture toughness was independent of notch length between a/D=0.2 and 0.4. appears that the fracture toughness measured using both the SENRBB and the SCB specimen was not affected by a limitation of the shape and the size of the specimens used.…”
Section: Effect Of Notch Lengthmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…For example, the fracture toughness of sandstone and tuff at a/D=0.6 decreased by approximately 38% and 49%, respectively, compared with those at a/D=0.4. A similar trend has been reported by Sun and Ouchterlony for granite [10]. Consequently, a/D of less than 0.4 was used in this study since the fracture toughness was independent of notch length between a/D=0.2 and 0.4. appears that the fracture toughness measured using both the SENRBB and the SCB specimen was not affected by a limitation of the shape and the size of the specimens used.…”
Section: Effect Of Notch Lengthmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…Rock fracture toughness is an intrinsic rock property that is used as an index for fragmentation processes such as rock cutting, hydraulic fracturing, explosive modeling etc. [1][2][3]. Numerous experimental and numerical researches have been developed for assessing rock fracture toughness in different conditions of fracture and loading.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They did not propose a geomechanical model nor even consider validating it, because the rock properties were not available. This paper presents a bibliographic review of rock testing methods used to determine prototype design requirements as published by Sun, and Ouchterlony, (1986). Then, the theory regarding the double torsion testing is described, followed by the design and construction of the prototype and the presentation of the results obtained from 9 specimens sampled from 2 different outcrops, to estimate traceability in the testing machine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%