2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(01)00062-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fracture toughness of bovine bone: influence of orientation and storage media

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
77
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
10
77
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As can be seen, dehydration causes an appreciable reduction of fracture energy, accompanied by a slight increase of elastic modulus, in agreement with earlier works (Currey, 1988a;Lucksanasombool et al, 2001;Nyman et al, 2006;Wang and Agrawal, 1996). The vascular porosity (Table 3) can be used to estimate the content of free water.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As can be seen, dehydration causes an appreciable reduction of fracture energy, accompanied by a slight increase of elastic modulus, in agreement with earlier works (Currey, 1988a;Lucksanasombool et al, 2001;Nyman et al, 2006;Wang and Agrawal, 1996). The vascular porosity (Table 3) can be used to estimate the content of free water.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…These toughening mechanisms are responsible for the resistance curve (Rcurve) behaviour observed by several researchers (Malik et al, 2003;Vashishth, 2004;Nalla et al, 2004b). This fact, allied to the size-scales involved in fracture testing of cortical bone, renders the pure LEFM theory inexact when applied to this material (Lucksanasombool et al, 2001;Ural and Vashishth, 2006). In the light of this, several authors have recently applied cohesive zone models for analyzing initiation and propagation of cracks in cortical bone (Ural and Vashishth, 2006;Yang et al, 2006;Cox and Yang, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is now a large body of results in the literature involving determinations of the fracture toughness of cortical bone using the linear-elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM) approach. This has for the large part involved single-parameter characterization of the toughness using either the critical value of the mode I linear-elastic stress intensity, K Ic [18,19,20,21,22,23]), or the related strain-energy release rate, G c . 1 In terms of K Ic , toughness values in cortical bone range from 2 to 7 MPa√m, with the fracture toughness, in human humeri for example, typically being up to twice as high in the transverse orientation compared to the longitudinal (medial-lateral and proximal-distal)…”
Section: Macroscopic Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For bones subjected to bending forces where the fracture should occur across the bone in the transverse direction, i.e., along a path of maximum tensile stress, the crack will often macroscopically deflect along the longitudinal direction in order to follow a "weaker" path along the cement lines [20,22,23,30], as can be seen for human cortical bone in Fig. 2 [30].…”
Section: Macroscopic Crack Deflectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the critical distance method and the experimental results for two groups of data, α=0.3 was estimated which is therefore comparable with the Coulomb-Mohr constant. Fracture properties of bone vary in a wide range according to the literature [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. The variation in fracture properties stems from the different testing conditions and different types of bone is used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%