2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fracture toughness determination of fused silica by cube corner indentation cracking and pillar splitting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Switching indenter geometries from the rather blunt Berkovich to the sharp cube corner tip unifies the cracking behavior within the NBS2 series. Radial cracking becomes predominant with increasing indenter sharpness, which is in good accordance with the literature (Gross, 2012;Bruns et al, 2020). However, cube corner indentation is usually accompanied with traces of chipping and, depending on the degree of chipping, the indentations show significant differences in radial crack extension (Figure 6D), ruling out a quantification of cracking according to Lawn et al (1980).…”
Section: The Mechanical Propertiessupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Switching indenter geometries from the rather blunt Berkovich to the sharp cube corner tip unifies the cracking behavior within the NBS2 series. Radial cracking becomes predominant with increasing indenter sharpness, which is in good accordance with the literature (Gross, 2012;Bruns et al, 2020). However, cube corner indentation is usually accompanied with traces of chipping and, depending on the degree of chipping, the indentations show significant differences in radial crack extension (Figure 6D), ruling out a quantification of cracking according to Lawn et al (1980).…”
Section: The Mechanical Propertiessupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Instrumented (nano-)indentation testing has become a widely used tool to investigate the deformation mechanisms of glass, as it activates a variety of possible responses: elastic contact, inelastic shear flow, densification and cracking (Rouxel, 2015;Yoshida et al, 2016;Januchta and Smedskjaer, 2019;Yoshida, 2019). Whereas, indentation-based methods to asses fracture toughness and their applicability to oxide glasses is controversially discussed in the literature (Bruns et al, 2017(Bruns et al, , 2020Rouxel and Yoshida, 2017;Yoshida, 2019), indentation testing remains one of the best solutions to compare glasses in terms of critical loads for crack initiation (Wada et al, 1974;Kato et al, 2010;Yoshida, 2019). Significant shifts in crack resistance have been observed upon chemical variations (Kato et al, 2010;Barlet et al, 2015;Malchow et al, 2015), different thermal histories (Malchow et al, 2015;Zehnder et al, 2017a), or upon compression (Januchta et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simulations indicate that the extent of densification is strongly linked to the hydrostatic pressure below the indenter, which does not exceed P = 10 GPa for all examined indenter geometries (Figure B: light grey sketched vertical line). Interestingly, this hydrostatic pressure corresponds remarkably well to fused silica's indentation hardness of about 9.6 GPa . According to Hill and Johnson the hydrostatic pressure saturates in a central region (inside the plastic zone) below the indenter.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Interestingly, this hydrostatic pressure corresponds remarkably well to fused silica's indentation hardness of about 9.6 GPa. 50 According to Hill 51 and Johnson 48 the hydrostatic pressure saturates in a central region (inside the plastic zone) below the indenter. In Johnson's expanding cavity model the pressure acting within this so-called hydrostatic core corresponds approximately to the mean indentation contact pressure, ie the indentation hardness H, which is defined as the applied load per projected contact area of the indentation.…”
Section: Influences Of Fea Tip Geometry On the Densification Maximumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14, а или балку с надрезом, разрушаемую изгибом) невозможно ввиду больших размеров образцов, которые требуют стандарты [159,160]. Поэтому большинство авторов используют одну из трех альтернативных схем испытания: 1) классическую, с измерением [166][167][168]. Коротко опишем и сравним наиболее популярные методы разрушающих наномеханических испытаний и полученные результаты.…”
Section: разрушение в микро- субмикрои наношкалеunclassified