2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.01.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fracture toughness determination of adhesive and co-cured joints in natural fibre composites

Abstract: a b s t r a c tAdhesive bonding has become more efficient in the last few decades due to the adhesives developments, granting higher strength and ductility. On the other hand, natural fibre composites have recently gained interest due to the low cost and density. It is therefore essential to predict the fracture behavior of joints between these materials, to assess the feasibility of joining or repairing with adhesives. In this work, the tensile fracture toughness (G c n ) of adhesive joints between natural fi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fig. 6 also shows some deviation between specimens of identical conditions, but perfectly within reported deviations under identical testing conditions [40]. Actually, this scatter is related to experimental phenomena such as fabrication issues or small measurement errors or geometry deviations.…”
Section: 06mentioning
confidence: 74%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Fig. 6 also shows some deviation between specimens of identical conditions, but perfectly within reported deviations under identical testing conditions [40]. Actually, this scatter is related to experimental phenomena such as fabrication issues or small measurement errors or geometry deviations.…”
Section: 06mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…6. The deviation is larger, though, and whose justification lies on the experimental process to obtain GIC, which relies on a number of measured parameters and approximation functions, which are difficult to adjust to the experimental data [40]. While for the specimens with h ¼ 1 mm, a value of GIC ¼ 0.78170.146 N/mm was obtained, improvements of 12.6%, 37.7% and 40.2% were attained by increasing h up to 4 mm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The CBBM is a relatively straightforward but robust method, based on an equivalent crack length (a eq ), and it only depends on the specimen's compliance during the test. Applied to the DCB test specimen, it gives Detailed explanations of the method can be found in the work of Campilho et al [26]. The value of a eq is estimated from the current specimen compliance and taking into (5) consideration the damage zone, E f is a corrected flexural modulus to account for stress concentrations at the crack tip and stiffness variability between specimens, and G AD is the shear modulus of the adherends.…”
Section: Fracture Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%