2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107818
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fracture toughness-based models for damage simulation of pultruded GFRP materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Four different GFRP materials (I152-CP, U150-ST, I200-FC and PL300-AP) will be considered to find suitable damage properties and to thoroughly investigate capabilities and limitations of CDMbased FE models containing linear softening in CODAM2. Almeida-Fernandes et al (2019, 2020a, 2020b conducted various experimental progressive fracture tests which will serve as reference for the numerical studies presented here. Note that the naming of the pultruded GFRP materials refers to the type of cross section (I, U or PLate), its height and manufacturer (Almeida-Fernandes et al, 2020a).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Four different GFRP materials (I152-CP, U150-ST, I200-FC and PL300-AP) will be considered to find suitable damage properties and to thoroughly investigate capabilities and limitations of CDMbased FE models containing linear softening in CODAM2. Almeida-Fernandes et al (2019, 2020a, 2020b conducted various experimental progressive fracture tests which will serve as reference for the numerical studies presented here. Note that the naming of the pultruded GFRP materials refers to the type of cross section (I, U or PLate), its height and manufacturer (Almeida-Fernandes et al, 2020a).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Nunes et al (2017) and Li et al (2017) used solid finite elements to simulate buckling/crushing and transverse impact behavior of pultruded GFRPs, respectively. Almeida-Fernandes et al (2020a) used shell elements to simulate the evolution of damage in pultruded GFRPs subjected to progressive tensile fracture tests. To highlight the challenge and uncertainty around finding suitable input damage parameters, these three studies apply vastly different fiber fracture energies of 2.38 N/mm (Nunes et al, 2017), 55 N/ mm (Li et al, 2017) and 100 N/mm (Almeida-Fernandes et al, 2020a) for similar pultruded GFRPs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 More precisely, many factors such as fibre 23 and matrix 24 type, fibre volume fraction, 25 fibre length, 11,26 fibre orientation, 27 dispersion state, 28 and interfacial bonding strength between fibres and plastic matrix 29 are of great importance for the overall performance of GFRP composites. 30 According to the technical literature, 31 two different failure mechanisms can be classified in unidirectional GFRP composites ( Figure 1):…”
Section: Fracture Behaviour Of Gfrp Composites: a Brief Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is probably due to the fact that fracture mechanisms significantly depend on both matrix and fibre material properties and their interfacial bonding properties 11 . More precisely, many factors such as fibre 23 and matrix 24 type, fibre volume fraction, 25 fibre length, 11,26 fibre orientation, 27 dispersion state, 28 and interfacial bonding strength between fibres and plastic matrix 29 are of great importance for the overall performance of GFRP composites 30 …”
Section: Fracture Behaviour Of Gfrp Composites: a Brief Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, Almeida-Fernandes et al [5] developed numerical damage models calibrated with experimentally based fracture toughness parameters on the pultruded glass fiber reinforced polymers. Taylor et al [6] studied the fracture strength of brittle materials by the effect of stress concentrations through SIF calculation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%