2007
DOI: 10.1007/s00603-007-0152-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fracture toughness analysis on cracked ring disks of anisotropic rock

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under loading, cracks initiate, propagate, and coalesce with other cracks, thereby decreasing the strength of rocks. The initiation and propagation of multiple cracks significantly affect many rock engineering problems, such as rock cutting, hydraulic fracturing, and explosive fracturing [1]. In the past decades, crack propagation in rocks has received attentions from many researches [2][3][4][5], among which many novel tests were applied to investigate crack patterns under compressive loads, such as the notched semi-circular bending tests (NSCB) [6], the cracked chevron notched semi-circular bending method (CCNSCB) [7], and the Brazil splitting tests [8].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under loading, cracks initiate, propagate, and coalesce with other cracks, thereby decreasing the strength of rocks. The initiation and propagation of multiple cracks significantly affect many rock engineering problems, such as rock cutting, hydraulic fracturing, and explosive fracturing [1]. In the past decades, crack propagation in rocks has received attentions from many researches [2][3][4][5], among which many novel tests were applied to investigate crack patterns under compressive loads, such as the notched semi-circular bending tests (NSCB) [6], the cracked chevron notched semi-circular bending method (CCNSCB) [7], and the Brazil splitting tests [8].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an inherent attribute representing the capability of rocks to resist fracturing under dynamic circumstances, rock dynamic fracture toughness has acquired extensive applications as diverse as rock classification, structure design, seismic events, rock bursts control and prevention, explosive storage, etc. (Chen et al 2008). In these cases, rocks often damage under a rather high loading rate, and, thus, the dynamic characteristics of rocks differ significantly from their static counterparts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Myriads of methods with varying sample configurations have been adopted in rock fracture toughness measurements including Brazilian disc (BD) method [1], notched semi-circular bend (NSCB) method [2] and [3], cracked chevron notched semi-circular bend (CCNSCB) method [4][5][6], cracked straight through Brazilian disc (CSTBD) method [7][8][9][10][11], cracked chevron notched Brazilian disc (CCNBD) method [12][13][14][15][16], diametric compression (DC) test [17], double edge cracked Brazilian disc (DECBD) method [18], edge crack triangular test [19], flattened Brazilian disc (FBD) method [20], hollow center cracked disc (HCCD) method [21], holed-cracked flattened Brazilian disc (HCFBD) method [22], holed-flattened Brazilian disc (HFBD) method [23], modified ring (MR) test [24], radial cracked ring [25] and [26], straight edge cracked round bar bend (SECRBB) http angle of friction method [27] and straight notched disk bending (SNDB) method [28]. At present, there are no standard methods of measuring Mode-I fracture toughness of rocks; only four suggested methods are proposed by International Society of Rock Mechanics (ISRM), namely chevron bending (CB) method and short rod (SR) method [29], CCNBD method [13] and NSCB method [30] and [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%