2013
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(13)60306-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fracture resistance of titanium and zirconia abutments: An in vitro study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

5
66
2
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
5
66
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This study showed that titanium abutments were associated with the highest fracture resistance, as previously reported . The highest mean fracture load of a metal‐ceramic crown supported by titanium abutments reported in this study (1012 N) was larger than what was reported by Cho and colleagues (333 N), Kohal and colleagues (531 N), and Leutert and colleagues (678.2 N).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This study showed that titanium abutments were associated with the highest fracture resistance, as previously reported . The highest mean fracture load of a metal‐ceramic crown supported by titanium abutments reported in this study (1012 N) was larger than what was reported by Cho and colleagues (333 N), Kohal and colleagues (531 N), and Leutert and colleagues (678.2 N).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The fracture resistance of ceramic abutments is higher than the maximum anterior occlusal loads reported in the literature . Nevertheless, titanium abutments have higher fracture resistance than zirconia abutments …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These include zirconia fracture and wear of the titanium implant body at the zirconia interface. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10] Wear of the implant body at the abutment interface has been compared for titanium and zirconia 1-piece abutments after various intervals of cyclic loading in vitro 4 and quantified with scanning electron microscopy and image analysis software. Implants paired with zirconia abutments experienced a greater initial rate of wear and more overall wear than implants with titanium abutments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a consistent trend has been observed toward esthetic improvements in implant restorative materials. To achieve optimal esthetics, investigators have developed zirconia ceramic abutments, advantages of which include light transmission properties, excellent esthetic qualities with resemblance to natural tooth color, and good compatibility with periimplant soft tissues 3,4) , with minimal disadvantages such as decreased fatigue resistance 5,6) . The fracture toughness of ceramics, even zirconia ceramics, is much less compared with that of metals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%