2019
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1695654
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fracture Resistance of Immature Incisors Following Root Filling with Various Bioactive Endodontic Cements Using an Experimental Bovine Tooth Model

Abstract: Objective The aim of this study was to compare the fracture resistance of immature bovine roots when using ProRoot MTA, CEM Cement, and Biodentine as root filling materials. Materials and Methods An immature bovine tooth model was developed by removing the coronal and apical portions of 70 bovine incisors 8 mm above and 12 mm below the cementoenamel junction (CEJ). The specimens were then divided into five groups: ProRoot MTA, CEM Cement, Biodentine, gutta-percha/AH26 sealer, and control. All groups … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(40 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sarraf et al [ 44 ] compared the fracture resistance of immature bovine teeth completely filled with MTA, CEM, and Biodentine with no post-space preparation and placement. They reported that MTA and Biodentine showed superior results over CEM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sarraf et al [ 44 ] compared the fracture resistance of immature bovine teeth completely filled with MTA, CEM, and Biodentine with no post-space preparation and placement. They reported that MTA and Biodentine showed superior results over CEM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They reported no statistically signi cant difference of fracture resistance between MTA, CEM, and Biodentine, while all the three materials showed higher fracture resistance than control (no obturation) group. Sarraf et al (24) compared the fracture resistance of immature bovine teeth lled with MTA, CEM, and Biodentine with no post-space preparation and placement. They reported that MTA and Biodentine showed superior results over CEM, and the fracture resistance was not different for CEM, gutta-percha and sealer, and control (dried cotton wool lling) groups.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have shown that coronal restoration materials have effects on fracture resistance as much as the root maturation when a tooth that had undergone endodontic treatment suffers a secondary trauma (35,36). Yet one similar study examining the effect of the thickness of the coronal plug material on the fracture resistance in RET reported that since the thickness of the coronal plug does not make any difference in the fracture resistance, the application of a 2-to 3-mm-thick coronal plug could be sufficient (13).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%