Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored With Bulk Fill, Bulk Fill Flowable, Fiber-reinforced, and Conventional Resin Composite

Abstract

The fracture resistance values of endodontically treated teeth restored with either bulk fill/bulk fill flowable or fiber-reinforced composite were not different from those restored with conventional nanohybrid resin composite.

Effect of Different Liners on Fracture Resistance of Premolars Restored with Conventional and Short Fiber‐Reinforced Composite Resins

“…Kikuti et al revealed that the combination of Single Bond/P60 composite resin was capable of recovering the fracture resistance of premolars with MOD cavities, while silorane adhesive/silorane composite resin could not . The important role of adhesive system in fracture strength of the restored teeth was confirmed by these authors so that Single Bond as a filled adhesive is able to create a thick adhesive layer, acting as a stress absorbent . Furthermore, this layer resulted in more even distribution of stresses induced by polymerization shrinkage and load testing .…”

“…The lower marginal microleakage of SFRC Class II restoration compared to conventional composite (Z250) was reported by Garoushi et al; two types of composite resins were bonded using an etch‐and‐rinse adhesive . The low bonding efficiency of one‐step self‐etch (G‐aenial Bond) used along with SFRC in a study by Atalay et al was reported as a possible explanation for no significant difference between SFRC and other restorations in terms of fracture resistance …”

“…This space was filled with polyether impression material, and the teeth were reinserted into the cylinders. The resulting layer mimicked the periodontal ligament . The long axis of the tooth was perpendicular to the base of the cylinder.…”

Fracture resistance, gap and void formation in root‐filled mandibular molars restored with bulk‐fill resin composites and glass‐ionomer cement base

“…The manufacturer recommends that the material will be capped with a traditional resin composite of approximately 2‐mm thickness because of its low strength and wear resistance. The reinforcing effect and gap/void formation of the flowable bulk‐fill material in ETT still remains unclear …”

“…The reinforcing effect and gap/void formation of the flowable bulk-fill material in ETT still remains unclear. 9,12 .…”