2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmps.2016.04.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fracture propagation in brittle materials as a standard dissipative process: General theorems and crack tracking algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In view of these original features and focusing on infinitesimal deformations we provided thorough derivations, differing advection to a companion paper. Similar reasoning holds for the analysis of mechanical failure [60,61,62,63,64], of numerical accuracy, stability, and convergence, which although deserving careful investigations fall out of the scope of the present paper.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…In view of these original features and focusing on infinitesimal deformations we provided thorough derivations, differing advection to a companion paper. Similar reasoning holds for the analysis of mechanical failure [60,61,62,63,64], of numerical accuracy, stability, and convergence, which although deserving careful investigations fall out of the scope of the present paper.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…fracturing in many small parts, caused by large deformations during lithiation [196]. Cracks have been observed even in active materials that undergo small deformations when lithiated, as for LiCoO 2 , LiMn 2 O 4 , and LiFePO 4 [197] To predict the onset of fracture in electrode particles, many authors [198,199,196,200,201,202,197,203] resorted to linear-elastic fracture mechanics [204,205,206,207]. A pre-existing flaws population in the particles was assumed and Griffith's criterion used to investigate the effects of charging rate and fracture toughness on the failure of particles of different sizes.…”
Section: The Modeling Of Micro-mechanical Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the prediction of failure events in engineering materials and structures, the advent of new computational capabilities has promoted the generation of different numerical tools including diffusive crack methods (Bazant and Jirasek, 2002;Comi, 1999;Peerlings et al, 2001;Dimitrijevic and Hackl, 2011), strong discontinuity procedures (Moes et al, 1999;Linder and Armero, 2007;Oliver et al, 2006) and cohesive-like crack approaches (Camacho and Ortiz, 1996;Ortiz and Pandolfi, 1999;Paggi and Wriggers, 2012;Turon et al, 2018), among many others, where most of them rely on the exploitation of finite element(FE)-based procedures. Recent variational formulations and crack tracking algorithms based on the analogy between linear elastic fracture mechanics and standard dissipative systems can be found in (Salvadori and Fantoni, 2016;Salvadori et al, 2019). Derived from its versatility for the estimation of failure mechanisms due to crack initiation and growth, the seminal variational approach of fracture developed by Francfort and Marigo (1998), being denominated as the phase field approach of fracture, endows a smeared crack idealization that permits overcoming most of the limitations of alternative numerical methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%